Search: in
Aristotelian argumentation
Aristotelian argumentation in Encyclopedia Encyclopedia
  Tutorials     Encyclopedia     Videos     Books     Software     DVDs  
       
Encyclopedia results for Aristotelian argumentation

Aristotelian argumentation





Encyclopedia results for Aristotelian argumentation

  1. Alasdair MacIntyre

    . He is Senior Research Fellow at the Centre for Contemporary Aristotelian Studies in Ethics ... Research Fellow at London Metropolitan University s Centre for Contemporary Aristotelian Studies ... to revive an Aristotelian conception of moral philosophy as sustained by the virtues, he nevertheless ... of moral rationality and argumentation that claim neither ultimate finality nor incorrigible certainty ... of Nietzsche, Sartre and Stevenson . He does this by returning to the tradition of Aristotelian ... . This Aristotelian Thomistic tradition, he proposes, presents the best theory so far , both of how ... the standpoint of ... Aristotelian moral and political practice. ref name Ibid Ibid. ref In general ... rationality of Aristotelian virtue ethics. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? 1988 main Whose ... or defeat one another e.g. Aristotelian, Augustinian, Thomist, Humean but also with substantiating ... by many the third part in a trilogy of philosophical argumentation that commenced with After Virtue ..., MacIntyre understands himself to be reworking the Aristotelian idea of an ethical teleology ... Virtue Ethics Rationality Aristotelian ethics American philosophy List of American philosophers ..., Kelvin, Aristotelian Philosophy Ethics and Politics from Aristotle to MacIntyre , Cambridge Polity ... six Aristotelian Revival . Skinner, Quentin. The Republican Ideal of Political Liberty , Machiavelli ... publications macintyre publications home.cfm Centre for Contemporary Aristotelian Studies in Ethics ...   more details



  1. Deductive fallacy

    Refimprove date May 2010 Wiktionary fallacy A deductive fallacy is defined as a deductive argument that is invalid. The argument itself could have true premise s, but still have a false logical consequence conclusion . ref cite web url http www.nizkor.org features fallacies title Description of Fallacies last Labossiere first Michael year 1995 publisher The Nizkor Project accessdate 2008 09 09 ref Thus, a deductive fallacy is a fallacy where deduction goes wrong, and is no longer a logical process. Logical fallacy The standard Aristotelian logical fallacies are Fallacy of four terms Quaternio terminorum Fallacy of the undistributed middle Fallacy of illicit process of the illicit major major or the illicit minor minor term and Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise . Other logical fallacies include The begging the question self reliant fallacy In philosophy , the term logical fallacy properly refers to a formal fallacy a flaw in the structure of a deductive reasoning deductive logical argument argument , which renders the argument validity invalid . However, it is often used more generally in informal discourse to mean an argument that is problematic for any reason, and thus encompasses informal fallacy informal fallacies as well as formal fallacies valid but soundness unsound claims or poor non deductive argumentation. The presence of a formal fallacy in a deductive argument does not imply anything about the argument s premises or its conclusion see fallacy fallacy . Both may actually be true, or even more probable as a result of the argument e.g. appeal to authority , but the deductive argument is still invalid because the conclusion does not follow from the premises in the manner described. By extension, an argument can contain a formal fallacy even if the argument is not a deductive one for instance an inductive argument that incorrectly applies principles of probability or causality can be said to commit a formal fallacy. Example File Logical fallacy.sv ...   more details



  1. Pragma-dialectics

    Frans H. van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst see 1984 1992 2004 at the University of Amsterdam , is an argumentation theory that is used to analyze and evaluate argumentation in actual practice. Unlike ... the entirety of an argumentation as a discourse activity. Thus, the pragma dialectical theory views argumentation as a complex speech act that occurs as part of natural language activities and has specific ... argumentation is viewed as a communicative and interactional discourse phenomenon that is to be studied ... of argumentation, the pragma dialectical theory uses four meta theoretical principles as its point ... on the meta theoretical principles described above, the pragma dialectical theory regards argumentation ... model of a critical discussion treats argumentative discourse as a discussion in which argumentation ... as a heuristic as well as a critical tool it respectively constitutes an instrument for the argumentation ..., argumentation stage and concluding stage see Van Eemeren & Grootendorst, 1984, pp.85 88 1992, pp.34 ... which propositions they can use in their argumentation. In the argumentation stage, the protagonist ... advanced by the other party. Relevance rule br A party may defend a standpoint only by advancing argumentation ... of an appropriate argumentation scheme that is correctly applied. Validity rule br A party may only use arguments in its argumentation that are logically valid or capable of being made logically ... maneuvering Recently, the pragma dialectical theory of argumentation has incorporated insights ... arguments Analyzing the argumentation structure. An analytical overview shows the differences of opinion ..., and the argumentation structure the relationship between a series of arguments presented ..., 3 evaluate whether the argumentation can be made logically valid, 4 check whether the argumentation ... be used to check whether the argumentation can stand up to criticism. If weaknesses are found, the argumentation can be adjusted or expanded thus it makes a useful guide for the creation of written ...   more details



  1. John Case

    John Case may refer to John Case Aristotelian writer , English Aristotelian writer died 1600 John Case astrologer born 1660 John Case athlete 1889 1975 John Case novelist , pseudonym for Jim Hougan born 1942 and Carolyn Hougan 1943 2007 See also John Case Schaeffer II born 1946 , American musician John Casey disambiguation hndis Case, John ...   more details



  1. Joseph W. Wenzel

    BLP sources date April 2011 Joseph W. Wenzel 1933 is an American argumentation and rhetorical scholar. He is Professor Emeritus at the University of Illinois, Champaign Urbana. ref http www.communication.illinois.edu faculty people jwenzel ref He has lectured in Austria, France, Belgium, Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands. He has published in Communication Monographs, Journal of the American Forensic Association, Quarterly Journal of Speech, and Argumentation. His students include Dale Hample , Daniel J. O Keefe, and Charles Arthur Willard . His seminal contribution to argument theory appears in 1979 Jurgen Habermas and the Dialectical Perspective on Argumentation , Journal of the American Forensic Association 16, 83 94. He has published 30 articles and book chapters on topics in rhetoric and argumentation. He received awards for publications from the Midwest Forensic Association and the American Forensic Association. He has been a frequent presenter at conferences in America and abroad, including a keynote address at the First International Conference on Argumentation in Amsterdam in 1986. He was Editor of the Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1983 86, and has served on the editorial boards of Argumentation, Central States Speech Journal, Communication Monographs, Informal Logic and Quarterly Journal of Speech. ref http www.mocktrialacademy.com printpop.asp?Id 18 ref References reflist Persondata Metadata see Wikipedia Persondata . NAME Wenzel, Joseph ale ALTERNATIVE NAMES SHORT DESCRIPTION American academic DATE OF BIRTH 1940 PLACE OF BIRTH DATE OF DEATH PLACE OF DEATH DEFAULTSORT Wenzel, Joseph Ale Category American academics Wenzel, Joseph W. Category 1940 births Category Living people ...   more details



  1. Rob Grootendorst

    Rob Grootendorst born February 11, 1944 in Schiedam died February 23, 2000 was a Netherlands Dutch communication and argumentation theory scholar. He was professor for Dutch speech communication at the University of Amsterdam . His contributions to the argumentation field include the co foundation of the Pragma dialectics pragma dialectic school in argumentation theory. He also wrote several books on the life and works of the Dutch writer and politician Theo Thijssen . Biography Grootendorst was a teacher at an elementary school in the 1960s. He studied Dutch studies at the University of Amsterdam since 1980, and became a Ph.D. in 1982 in Speech Communication. The dissertation was jointly written with Frans H. van Eemeren . They jointly founded the International Society for the Study of Argumentation in 1986. References Hans V. Hansen 2000 http www.phaenex.uwindsor.ca ojs leddy index.php informal logic article download 2274 1718 Rob Grootendorst. In Memoriam. 1944 2000 , Informal Logic journal Informal Logic , vol 20, No 2. pp. 203 204 http www.theothijssenmuseum.nl index.php?pageid basis&catid Grootendorst In memoriam Rob Grootendorst nl icon , Theo Thijssen museum Persondata Metadata see Wikipedia Persondata . NAME Grootendorst, Rob ALTERNATIVE NAMES SHORT DESCRIPTION DATE OF BIRTH February 11, 1944 PLACE OF BIRTH DATE OF DEATH February 23, 2000 PLACE OF DEATH DEFAULTSORT Grootendorst, Rob Category Dutch academics Category Communication theorists Category 1944 births Category 2000 deaths de Robert Grootendorst nl Rob Grootendorst academic stub ...   more details



  1. Third man argument

    as an example however the argumentation obviously holds for any F. Begin, then, with the assumption ... Man, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl. vol. 37 1963 147 164 s Plato A Collection of Critical ...   more details



  1. G. Thomas Goodnight

    G. Thomas Goodnight is an American argumentation and rhetorical scholar. He is a professor and director of doctoral studies in the USC Annenberg School for Communication Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Southern California . He has published essays in Communication Monographs , Communication Theory , Journal of the American Forensic Association , Quarterly Journal of Speech , and Argumentation .He has lectured in France, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Yugoslavia, and the Netherlands. His seminal contribution to the field of argumentation theory lies in his approach to spheres of argument, an idea that has sparked many scholarly studies. Before joining USC full time in 2004, Goodnight taught undergraduate and graduate courses in Northwestern University s Communication Studies department in contemporary rhetorical theory, criticism, theory of argumentation, and the public sphere. His current research interests include deliberation and postwar society, science communication, argument and aesthetics, public discourse studies, and communicative reason in controversy. Professor Goodnight has been named by the American Forensics Association as one of the top 5 scholars in argumentation in the twentieth century. ref Peterson s graduate programs in the humanities, arts, & social sciences, 2006, p. 922 ref References references External links http annenberg.usc.edu Faculty Communication GoodnightG.aspx USC homepage Persondata Metadata see Wikipedia Persondata . NAME Goodnight, G. Thomas ALTERNATIVE NAMES SHORT DESCRIPTION DATE OF BIRTH PLACE OF BIRTH DATE OF DEATH PLACE OF DEATH DEFAULTSORT Goodnight, G. Thomas Category American academics Category Living people Category University of Southern California faculty Category Communication theorists US academic bio stub ...   more details



  1. Narrative paradigm

    their own lives into determining the story s fidelity. Narrative and argumentation Narration is one ... and time. In contrast argumentation must be taught and it is the basis for public discourse in our culture. However, after learning argumentation, people often resist using it and prefer to use narratives ... of Aristotelian analysis, which has always dominated the field of rhetorical thinking. Fisher ... R. 1988 . The Narrative Paradigm and the Assessment of Historical Texts. in Argumentation and Advocacy ... Discourse. in Argumentation 8. pp. 21 32. Fisher, Walter R. 1995 . Narration, Knowledge, and the Possibility ...   more details



  1. Daniel J. O'Keefe

    Daniel J. O Keefe born 1950 is an United States American communication and argumentation theory scholar. He is the Owen L. Coon Professor in the Northwestern University School of Communication Department of Communication Studies at Northwestern University . His research concerns persuasion and argumentation , with a focus on meta analytic synthesis of research concerning persuasive message effects.. ref name nwu http www.communication.northwestern.edu faculty ?PID DanielOKeefe Northwestern University School of Communication Faculty Page ref This program of work often addresses the question of whether normatively good argumentation contributes to persuasive success. O Keefe is the author of Persuasion Theory and Research ISBN 0 761 92539 2 , a review of empirical research on persuasion. His work has been published in the Journal of Communication , Human Communication Research , Communication Monographs , Communication Theory , Communication Yearbook , Argumentation , Quarterly Journal of Speech , Argumentation and Advocacy , and other journals. Awards From the National Communication Association ref http www.natcom.org uploadedFiles Content About PastAwardWinnersUpdatedFeb2011.pdf National Communication Association Award Winners ref Charles Woolbert Research Award, 1986 Golden Anniversary Monograph Award, 1982 Rhetorical and Communication Theory Division Distinguished Scholar Award, 2005 From the American Forensic Association ref http www.americanforensics.org node 40 American Forensic Association Award Winners ref Daniel Rohrer Memorial Research Award, 1977 From the International Communication Association ref http www.icahdq.org about ica awards allwinners.asp International Communication Association Award Winners ref Health Communication Division Article of the Year Award ... Society for the Study of Argumentation ref http cf.hum.uva.nl issa about issa awards.html Insternational Society for the Study of Argumentation Award Winners ref Distinguished Scholar Award From ...   more details



  1. Impetus

    wiktionary impetus Impetus may refer to Impetus album Impetus album , a re release of the EP Passive Restraints Impetus mechanics , a concept very similar to momentum Jean Buridan Impetus Theory , middle ages treatment on impetus and its originator Jean Buridan Theory of impetus , an auxiliary theory of Aristotelian dynamics disambig de Impetus ...   more details



  1. Passeri (disambiguation)

    Passeri can refer to Cinzio Passeri Aldobrandini , an Italian Cardinal, nephew of Pope Clement VIII Giovanni Battista Passeri , an Italian painter of the Baroque period Giuseppe Passeri , an Italian painter of the Baroque period Marco Antonio Passeri , an Italian Renaissance Aristotelian philosopher Torre de Passeri , a comune in the Province of Pescara in the Abruzzo region of Italy surname ...   more details



  1. Kinesis

    Kinesis may refer to Kinesis biology , a movement or activity of a cell or an organism in response to a stimulus Kinesis band Kinesis keyboard kinesis , the suffix motion or change in Aristotelian philosophy Greek kin sis see potentiality and actuality Kinesis Industry , a manufacturer of bicycle frames and components disambig ...   more details



  1. De motu animalium (disambiguation)

    Italic title De motu animalium Movement of Animals is a treatise by Aristotle. Later works using the same title not including numerous commentaries on the Aristotelian work are De motu animalium by Giovanni Alfonso Borelli 1608 1679 De motu animalium spontaneo by Pierre Petit scholar 1617 1687 Disambig ...   more details



  1. ASPIC

    ASPIC may be Advanced Space Propulsion Investigation Committee Advanced SCSI Programmable Interrupt Controller Application Service Provider Industry Consortium Armed Services Personnel Interrogation Center Association for Strategic Planning in Internal Communications Author s Standard Prepress Interfacing Code Argumentation Service Platform with Integrated Components See also Aspic . disambig Category Acronyms fr Aspic ...   more details



  1. Logic

    language . ref name stanford logic onthology Logic is also studied in argumentation theory . ref cite ... editor2 link Charles Arthur Willard title Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research publisher Southern ..., not by its content. Traditional syllogism Aristotelian syllogistic logic and modern symbolic logic .... The fundamental difference between modern formal logic and traditional or Aristotelian logic lies ... of logic Logic arose see below from a concern with correctness of argumentation . Modern logicians ... of the science of logic . ref Aristotelian logic became widely accepted in science and mathematics ... Main Aristotelian logic The Organon was Aristotle s body of work on logic, with the Prior Analytics ... by the advent of propositional logic and the predicate calculus . Others use Aristotle in argumentation theory to help develop and critically question argumentation schemes that are used in artificial ... in natural language. Aristotelian syllogistic logic specifies a small number of forms that the relevant ..., side by side with the development of the syllogistic, and in the Aristotelian school, these informal ... universities. Argumentation theory is the study and research of informal logic, fallacies, and critical ... and questioned to reveal premises, conclusions, and fallacies. Argumentation theory is now ... in formal and informal logic. Argumentation theory is one good example of how logic is being applied ...   more details



  1. Sorites (journal)

    Unreferenced date March 2010 About the academic journal the argument form in traditional logic Polysyllogism other uses Sorites disambiguation Sorites italictitle Infobox journal title Sorites formertitle cover editor Lorenzo Pe a discipline Analytic philosophy abbreviation publisher Lorenzo Pe a country Spain frequency history 1995 present website http www.sorites.org link2 http www.sorites.info link2 name Mirror site RSS atom OCLC 47729709 JSTOR LCCN CODEN ISSN 1135 1349 eISSN Sorites is a Peer review peer reviewed academic journal covering analytic philosophy . The journal favors no particular school or tendency within analytical philosophy. Its only conditions for publication are standards of rigour, clarity, and careful argumentation theory argumentation . It is indexed by The Philosopher s Index . Category Analytic philosophy Category Philosophy journals Category English language journals Category Publications established in 1995 ...   more details



  1. C. Scott Jacobs

    Curtis Scott Jacobs, Scott Jacobs , is an American argumentation, communication, and rhetorical scholar. He graduated from the University of Illinois with a Ph.d. He taught for many years at the University of Arizona . He is now Professor of Communication at the University of Illinois . ref http www.communication.illinois.edu faculty people csjacobs index.html ref He has lectured in France, Belgium, Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands. He has contributed to the field of argumentation theory . His work appeared in Communication Monographs, Communication Theory, Journal of the American Forensic Association , Quarterly Journal of Speech, and Argumentation. Works cite book url http books.google.com books?id fIoCW2 RgWIC&pg PA681&dq 22Scott Jacobs 22&cd 4 v onepage&q 22Scott 20Jacobs 22&f false author Sally Jackson and Scott Jacobs chapter Structure of Conversational Argument Pragmatic Bases for the Enthymeme title Readings in argumentation editors William L. Benoit, Dale Hample, Pamela J. Benoit publisher Walter de Gruyter year 1992 isbn 9783110135763 appeared in The Quarterly Journal of Speech . LXVI, 251 265. cite book url http books.google.com books?id moNnQXT7J80C&pg RA1 PA43&dq 22Scott Jacobs 22&cd 1 v onepage&q 22Scott 20Jacobs 22&f false chapter Digressions in Argumentative Discourse title Understanding face to face interaction issues linking goals and discourse author Karen Tracy editor Karen Tracy publisher Routledge year 1991 isbn 9780805809077 cite book url http books.google.com books?id t97fuAcjS YC&pg PA213&dq 22Scott Jacobs 22&cd 2 v onepage&q 22Scott 20Jacobs 22&f false chapter Language and Interpersonal Communication title Handbook of interpersonal communication editors Mark L. Knapp, John Augustine Daly publisher SAGE year 2002 isbn 9780761921608 cite book url ... &f false chapter Two Conceptions of Openness in Argumentation Theory title Anyone who has a view theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation editors F. H. van Eemeren, J. Anthony Blair ...   more details



  1. John Corcoran (logician)

    unnoticed gaps and errors in Boole s work and established the essentially Aristotelian basis of Boole ... of Aristotelian logic and Boolean logic . His collaboration with Alfred Tarski in the late 1970s and early ... and Metalogic Aristotle, Boole, and Tarski, which traces Aristotelian and Boolean ideas in Tarski .... His philosophical papers often involve original historical research. He has been guided by the Aristotelian .... Argumentation 3 1989 17&ndash 43. , Spanish translation by R. Fernandez and J. Sag illo Agora 13 1 ...   more details



  1. G. E. R. Lloyd

    to the history of thought . Publications 1966. Polarity and Analogy Two Types of Argumentation in Early ... Greek and Chinese Science . Cambridge Cambridge Univ. Pr. ISBN 0 521 55695 3. 1996. Aristotelian Explorations ...   more details



  1. Outline of logic

    an incorrect argumentation in reasoning resulting in a misconception or presumption. By accident or design ... algebra Boolean algebra logic Boolean logic Truth value Venn diagram Pierce s law Aristotelian logic Non Aristotelian logic Informal logic Fuzzy logic Infinitary logic Infinity Categorical logic College ...   more details



  1. Robert Alexy

    File Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Robert Alexy.jpg thumb Robert Alexy. Robert Alexy born September 9, 1945 in Oldenburg , Germany is a jurist and a Jurisprudence legal philosopher . Alexy studied law and philosophy at the University of G ttingen . He received his PhD in 1976 with the dissertation A Theory of Legal Argumentation , and he achieved his Habilitation in 1984 with a Theory of Constitutional Rights . He is a professor at the University of Kiel ref cite web url http www.alexy.jura.uni kiel.de title Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Robert Alexy publisher CAU accessdate 22 January 2011 ref and in 2002 he was appointed to the Academy of Sciences and Humanities at the University of G ttingen. ref cite web url http www.uni goettingen.de de 186855.html title Mitglieder publisher University of G ttingen accessdate 22 January 2011 ref In 2010 he was awarded the Order of Merit of the Federal Republic of Germany . ref cite web url http www.uni kiel.de aktuell pm 2010 2010 066 alexy verdienstkreuz.shtml title Professor Robert Alexy erh lt das Verdienstkreuz 1. Klasse date 20 April 2010 publisher Christian Albrechts Universit t language German accessdate 22 January 2011 ref Alexy s definition of law looks like a mix of Hans Kelsen Kelsen s Grundnorm normativism which was an influential version of legal positivism and Gustav Radbruch Radbruch s natural law legal naturalism Alexy, 2002 , but Alexy s Argumentation theory theory of argumentation Alexy, 1983 puts him very close to Interpretivism legal legal interpretivism . Publications Theorie der juristischen Argumentation. Die Theorie des rationalen Diskurses als Theorie der juristischen Begr ndung 1983, first edition 1978 . Translated by Neil MacCormick as A Theory of Legal Argumentation The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification Clarendon, 1989 . Theorie der Grundrechte 1985 second edition 1994 . Translated by Julian Rivers as A Theory of Constitutional Rights Oxford University Press, 2002 . Mauersch tzen 19 ...   more details



  1. Discourse ethics

    Discourse ethics , sometimes called argumentation ethics , refers to a type of argument that attempts to establish normative or ethical truths by examining the presuppositions of discourse. citation needed ... dimensions attached to speech acts in communication and the implicit forms of argumentation they imply ... only intersubjectively in processes of argumentation between individuals in a dialectic . The validity ... in argument. From this it follows that the presupposition s of argumentation would become important ... and argumentation. These presuppositions were the kinds of idealization that individuals had to make in order for communication and argumentation to even begin. For example The presupposition ... The presupposition that no validity claim is exempt in principle from critical evaluation in argumentation ... to distill the idealized moral point of view that accompanies a perfectly rational process of argumentation ... above. The key point is that the presuppositions of argumentation and communication that have been ... by the very structural condition of rational argumentation. He maintains that what is implied in these factual ... in argumentation concerning its validity. No number of thought experiments can replace a communicative ... guidelines explicated from the deep structures of communication and argumentation. This spawns discourses ... but aimed at a universal moral validity. Argumentation ethics Main Argumentation ethics Hans Hermann Hoppe who was Habermas s doctorate student later developed Argumentation Ethics 1988 ref http www.hanshoppe.com ... that since verbal argumentation aims to resolve conflicts in a non violent way, only the Non aggression principle is consistent with that aim and therefore it is presupposition presupposed in argumentation and only it can be argued without contradiction. See also Argumentation theory The Foucault ... sel topics.php arg ethics title Argumentation Ethics last Hoppe first Hans Hermann publisher ... s Critique of Hans Hermann Hoppe s Argumentation Ethics last van Dun first Frank accessdate 2009 ...   more details



  1. Hexis (disambiguation)

    Hexis is a term used in Aristotelian philosophy. Hexis may also refer to a term used in sociology see Habitus sociology Habitus a character in the computer game Heroes of Might and Magic IV The Gathering Storm a registered trademark used by Hexis S.A. , French company based in Frontignan an auto racing team, Hexis Racing a division of Sulzer manufacturer Sulzer AG , a Swiss company based in Winterthur Not to be confused with Hexisea , a flower of the family of orchids. disambig fr Hexis de Hexis ...   more details



  1. Genua (disambiguation)

    wiktionary Genua Genua is a fictional city from Terry Pratchett s Discworld novels. Genua may also refer to 485 Genua , a main belt asteroid Marcantonio Genua 1491 1563 , Renaissance Aristotelian philosopher Genua , the ancient Ligurian name for the modern Italian city of Genoa , and also the Latin name and an alternative, archaic name in English for the city. Genoa , a city in Italy . Genua is the German name for the city. See also Genoa disambiguation disambig Category Surnames ...   more details




Articles 26 - 50 of 1972      Previous     Next


Search   in  
Search for Aristotelian argumentation in Tutorials
Search for Aristotelian argumentation in Encyclopedia
Search for Aristotelian argumentation in Videos
Search for Aristotelian argumentation in Books
Search for Aristotelian argumentation in Software
Search for Aristotelian argumentation in DVDs
Search for Aristotelian argumentation in Store


Advertisement




Aristotelian argumentation in Encyclopedia
Aristotelian argumentation top Aristotelian argumentation

Home - Add TutorGig to Your Site - Disclaimer

©2011-2013 TutorGig.info All Rights Reserved. Privacy Statement