Search: in
Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd (No 2)
Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd (No 2) in Encyclopedia Encyclopedia
  Tutorials     Encyclopedia     Videos     Books     Software     DVDs  
       
Encyclopedia results for Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd (No 2)

Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd (No 2)





Encyclopedia results for Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd (No 2)

  1. Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd (No 2)

    Unreferenced date February 2010 Infobox Court Case name Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd No 2 court High Court of Australia date decided 17 April 1985 full name Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd No 2 citations http www.austlii.edu.au au cases cth HCA 1985 27.html 1985 159 CLR 461 1985 HCA 27 judges Harry Gibbs Gibbs CJ, Anthony Mason judge Mason , Ronald Wilson Wilson Gerard Brennan Brennan , William Deane Deane , Daryl Dawson Dawson JJ prior actions Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd No 1 1985 HCA 8 1985 159 CLR 351 subsequent actions none opinions per curiam The circumstance that a question is of great importance and that opinions are divided upon it does not provide a reason for granting a certificate. Questions of constitutional importance should be finally decided by the High Court and the jurisdiction to grant a certificate under s 74 is obsolete. Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd No 2 1985 HCA 27 1985 159 Commonwealth Law Reports CLR 461, was a decision handed down in the High Court of Australia on 17 April 1985 concerning Section 74 of the Australian Constitution section 74 of the Constitution of Australia . The Court denied an application by Attorney General for Queensland for a certificate that the questions of law arising from the Court s decision in Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd No 1 ought to be determined by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council Privy Council . Until the Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd No 2 case, decisions of the High Court of Australia could be appealed to the Privy Council, if the High Court allowed it. In this case, all the Judges decided that the High Court itself would be the final court of appeal for Australian legal cases. Category High Court of Australia cases Category Australian constitutional law Category 1985 in Australia Category 1985 in case law australia law stub ...   more details



  1. Airlines of New South Wales Pty Ltd v New South Wales (No 2)

    orphan date January 2008 Infobox Court Case name Airlines of New South Wales Pty Ltd v New South Wales No 2 court High Court of Australia image Australian coat of arms 1912 edit.png date decided 3 February 1965 full name Airlines of New South Wales Pty Ltd v New South Wales No 2 citations http www.austlii.edu.au au cases cth high ct 113clr54.html 1965 113 CLR 54 judges Garfield Barwick Barwick CJ, Edward McTiernan McTiernan , Frank Kitto Kitto , Alan Taylor jurist Taylor , Douglas Menzies Menzies , Victor Windeyer Windeyer and William Owen judge Owen JJ prior actions none subsequent actions none opinions 6 1 Air Navigation Regulations 198 and 199 were held to be within power, as they promoted the safety of interstate trade and commerce small Barwick CJ, McTiernan, Kitto, Menzies, Windeyer & Owen JJ Taylor J dissenting small 7 0 Regulation 200B was held to be invalid as it went beyond being a safety measure small Barwick CJ, McTiernan, Kitto, Taylor, Menzies, Windeyer & Owen JJ small Airlines of New South Wales Pty Ltd v New South Wales No 2 1965 113 Commonwealth Law Reports CLR 54 was a High Court of Australia case about the validity of Commonwealth regulations about intrastate air navigation . Although the Commonwealth has the power to regulate wiktionary interstate interstate air navigation under Section 51 i of the Australian Constitution s 51 i of the Constitution, it can only regulate intrastate air navigation under the implied incidental power attached to that head of power. It was held that intrastate air navigation can be regulated to the extent that it provides for the safety ... to by Owen Dixon Dixon CJ in Wragg v State of New South Wales 1953 88 CLR 353, which was quoted ... South Australia v The Commonwealth 1942 65 CLR 373. Furthermore, Barwick CJ reiterated the rejection of the reserved State powers doctrine see Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co. Ltd. . In this instance, the enactment of State laws will not serve to curtail any Commonwealth ...   more details



  1. Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria

    Infobox Court Case name Anderson s Pty Ltd v Victoria court High Court of Australia image Australia coa.png date decided 17 December 1964 full name Anderson s Pty Ltd v Victoria citations http www.austlii.edu.au au cases cth high ct 111clr353.html 1964 111 CLR 353 judges Garfield Barwick Barwick CJ, Edward McTiernan McTiernan , Frank Kitto Kitto , Alan Taylor jurist Taylor , Douglas Menzies Menzies and Victor Windeyer Windeyer JJ prior actions none subsequent actions none opinions Anderson s Pty Ltd v Victoria 1964 111 Commonwealth Law Reports CLR 353 is a High Court of Australia case that dealt with Section 90 of the Australian Constitution section 90 of the Constitution of Australia Australian Constitution . In this case, following on from such cases as Dennis Hotels Pty Ltd v Victoria , Barwick CJ accepted the broad approach to the definition of an excise, but rejected the formalistic criterion of liability approach for determining if the excise falls at the relevant step. He adopted the substance over form approach, or the substantial effects doctrine, in that there are many factors to be considered, for example, the indirectness of the tax, its effect on the cost of goods and its proximity to the production or distribution of the goods. See also Section 90 of the Australian Constitution Australian constitutional law References George Winterton Winterton, G. et al. Australian federal constitutional law commentary and materials , 1999. LBC Information Services, Sydney. External links http www.austlii.edu.au au cases cth high ct 111clr353.html Full text of the decision Category High Court of Australia cases Category 1964 in Australia Category Australian constitutional law Category Excise in the Australian Constitution cases Category 1964 in case law ...   more details



  1. Hematite Petroleum Pty Ltd v Victoria

    Infobox Court Case name Hematite Petroleum Pty Ltd v Victoria court High Court of Australia image Australia coa.png date decided 5 August 1983 full name Hematite Petroleum Pty Ltd v Victoria citations http www.austlii.edu.au au cases cth high ct 151clr599.html 1983 151 CLR 599 judges Harry Gibbs Gibbs CJ, Anthony Mason judge Mason , Lionel Murphy Murphy , Ronald Wilson Wilson , Gerard Brennan Brennan and William Deane Deane JJ prior actions none subsequent actions none opinions Hematite Petroleum Pty Ltd v Victoria 1983 151 Commonwealth Law Reports CLR 599 is a High Court of Australia case that deals with Section 90 of the Australian Constitution section 90 of the Constitution of Australia Australian Constitution . Background The plaintiffs sought a declaration that the tax imposed in the Pipelines Act 1967 Victoria Australia Vic , as amended by the Pipelines Fees Act 1981 Vic , was invalid for being an excise duty contrary to section 90. The pipeline operation fee for the financial year 1981 1982 was 10 million for the trunk pipelines. These pipelines were used for the transportation of gas liquids and crude oil, which formed an integral step in the production of the products sold by the plaintiffs . Decision Mason J restated the rejection of the narrow view of excise, but noted that the broad view was tempered by the insistence of the Court that there be a strict relationship between the tax and the goods the criterion of liability approach , and the problem of defining that relationship. He referred to the formulation in Bolton v Madsen , which has not emerged unscathed from the more recent decisions on s 90 for example, there was Barwick CJ s formulation of a variety of factors in Anderson s Pty Ltd v Victoria . His Honour notes that section 90 would do very little to add to the powers of the Commonwealth s economic and financial powers, if the States were allowed to circumvent the prohibition in section 90 through the criterion of liability approach. Since section ...   more details



  1. Dickenson's Arcade Pty Ltd v Tasmania

    Infobox Court Case name Dickenson s Arcade Pty Ltd v Tasmania court High Court of Australia image Australia coa.png date decided 1 April 1974 full name Dickenson s Arcade Pty Ltd v Tasmania citations http www.austlii.edu.au au cases cth high ct 130clr177.html 1974 130 CLR 177 judges Garfield Barwick Barwick CJ, Edward McTiernan McTiernan , Douglas Menzies Menzies , Harry Gibbs Gibbs , Ninian Stephen Stephen and Anthony Mason judge Mason JJ prior actions none subsequent actions none opinions 5 1 A licensing scheme with a backdating mechanism is not an excise small per Barwick CJ, Menzies, Gibbs, Stephen & Mason JJ McTiernan J dissenting small Dickenson s Arcade Pty Ltd v Tasmania 1974 130 Commonwealth Law Reports CLR 177 is a High Court of Australia case that dealt with Section 90 of the Australian Constitution section 90 of the Constitution of Australia Australian Constitution . In this case, the Act in question imposed licences for the sale of tobacco, and the fee was calculated as being 2.5 percent of the retail value of tobacco sold in the 12 month period ending 6 months prior to the licence period. Three judges, namely Gibbs, Menzies and Stephen JJ, applied the criterion of liability approach and held that the fee was not an excise and thus not invalid by section 90 see Dennis Hotels Pty Ltd v Victoria . Barwick CJ and Mason J, while disapproving of the criterion of liability approach, felt bound to follow the precedent set by Dennis Hotels , since the facts of that cases were quite similar to those in this case. The Court, with the exception of McTiernan J, excluded consumption taxes from duties of excise, although such taxes are frequently also a tax on the sale of goods. See also Section 90 of the Australian Constitution Australian constitutional law References George Winterton Winterton, G. et al. Australian federal constitutional law commentary and materials , 1999. LBC Information Services, Sydney. External links http www.austlii.edu.au au cases cth high ct ...   more details



  1. Murphyores Inc Pty Ltd v Commonwealth

    Infobox Court Case name Murphyores Inc Pty Ltd v Commonwealth court High Court of Australia image Australian coat of arms 1912 edit.png date decided April 14, 1976 full name Murphyores Inc Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth of Australia citations http www.austlii.edu.au au cases cth high ct 136clr1.html 1976 136 CLR 1 , http www.austlii.edu.au au cases cth HCA 1976 20.html & 091 1976& 093 HCA 20 judges Garfield Barwick Barwick CJ, Edward McTiernan McTiernan , Harry Gibbs Gibbs , Ninian Stephen Stephen , Anthony Mason judge Mason , Kenneth Jacobs Jacobs & Lionel Murphy Murphy JJ prior actions none subsequent actions none opinions 7 0 Section 112 of the Customs Act 1901 Cth was a constitutionally valid law under the trade and commerce power small per Barwick CJ, McTiernan, Gibbs, Stephen, Mason, Jacobs & Murphy JJ small Murphyores Inc Pty Ltd v Commonwealth 1976 136 Commonwealth Law Reports CLR 1 1976 HCA 20, was a case decided in the High Court of Australia regarding the scope of the trade and commerce power in Section 51 i of the Australian Constitution section 51 i of the Australian Constitution Constitution . Background Section 112 of the http www.austlii.edu.au au legis cth consol act ca1901124 Customs Act 1901 Cth prohibited the exportation of mineral sands unless authorised by the Minister. Murphyores Inc Pty Ltd, which held leases from the state of Queensland to mine mineral sands on Fraser Island , sought permission from the Minister to export mineral sands. Such authorisation was withheld pending the outcome of an environmental inquiry. Murphyores challenged the constitutional validity of prohibition and sought an injunction to the study, and a declaration that the Minister cannot make a prohibition for environmental purposes. Decision In a unanimous decision, the court held the legislation was a valid exercise of the trade and commerce power. Section 51 i of the Australian Constitution Section 51 i was a non purposive power, and the only relevant factor was the subject ...   more details



  1. Bath v Alston Holdings Pty Ltd

    orphan date January 2008 Infobox Court Case name Bath v Alston Holdings Pty Ltd court High Court of Australia image Australian coat of arms 1912 edit.png date decided 7 June 1988 full name Bath v Alston Holdings Pty Ltd citations http www.austlii.edu.au au cases cth high ct 165clr411.html 1988 165 CLR 411 judges Anthony Mason judge Mason CJ, Ronald Wilson Wilson , Gerard Brennan Brennan , William Deane Deane , Daryl Dawson Dawson , John Toohey judge Toohey and Mary Gaudron Gaudron JJ prior actions none subsequent actions none opinions 4 3 The retail fee in question was found to be discriminatory and protectionist in relation to interstate trade small per Mason CJ, Brennan, Deane & Dawson JJ Wilson, Toohey & Dawson JJ dissenting small Bath v Alston Holdings Pty Ltd 1988 165 Commonwealth Law Reports CLR 411 is a High Court of Australia case that discusses the application of the freedom of interstate trade, as specified in Section 92 of the Australian Constitution section 92 of the Constitution of Australia Australian Constitution . This case followed the unanimous decision of Cole v Whitfield regarding the interpretation of section 92 as about free trade as opposed to individual rights. Background The Business Franchise Tobacco Act 1974 Victoria Australia Vic imposed a licensing scheme for the sale of tobacco . For retailers, the fee was composed of a flat fee and an amount equal to 25 of the value of the tobacco sold in the previous twelve months. The Act also made for the provision of wholesalers, and tobacco bought by retailers from Victorian wholesalers would not be taken ... sold. The defendant, Alston Holdings Pty Ltd, was a tobacco retailer in Victoria, who imported ... to challenge the Act on section 92 grounds. Decision The unanimous decision in Cole v Whitfield soothed ... came only weeks later, brought with it a split bench, but as suggested in Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v South Australia 1990 169 CLR 436, The difference ... flowed more from disagreement about the appropriate ...   more details



  1. Dennis Hotels Pty Ltd v Victoria

    Infobox Court Case name Dennis Hotels Pty Ltd v Victoria court High Court of Australia image Australian coat of arms 1912 edit.png date decided 26 February 1960 full name Dennis Hotels Pty Ltd v Victoria citations http www.austlii.edu.au au cases cth high ct 104clr529.html 1960 104 CLR 529 judges Owen Dixon Dixon CJ, Edward McTiernan McTiernan , Wilfred Fullagar Fullagar , Frank Kitto Kitto , Alan Taylor jurist Taylor , Douglas Menzies Menzies and Victor Windeyer Windeyer JJ prior actions none subsequent actions none opinions 4 3 The fee for the renewal of a liquor retailer s licence was held not to be an excise small per Fullagar, Kitto, Menzies & Taylor JJ small 4 3 The fee for the temporary licence was held to be an excise small per Dixon CJ, McTiernan, Menzies & Windeyer JJ small Dennis Hotels Pty Ltd v Victoria 1960 104 Commonwealth Law Reports CLR 529 is a High Court of Australia case that deals with Section 90 of the Australian Constitution section 90 of the Constitution of Australia Australian Constitution , which prohibits States from levying customs or excise duties. Although some of the judges used the now discredited criterion of liability approach, this case remains authority for cases that are factually similar to it. Background The Licensing Act 1958 Vic contained two sections of contention. Section 19 1 a imposed fees for the grant or renewal of liquor licences, and the fee was calculated as 6 percent of the value of liquor purchased during the 12 months up to June 30 of the previous year. Section 19 1 b imposed fees for temporary licences, and the fee would be 1 Australian pound pound per year together with 6 percent of the value of liquor purchased. Decision Three judges, Fullagar, Kitto and Taylor JJ, used the highly formalistic criterion of liability approach which has since been discredited to decide this case. In this approach, the fees were not viewed ..., applying the minority judgment in Parton v Milk Board Vic . However, in deciding the character ...   more details



  1. Milirrpum v Nabalco Pty Ltd

    Milirrpum v Nabalco Pty Ltd , 1971 17 FLR 141 the Gove land rights case , was the first litigation on native title in Australia . The decision of Justice Richard Blackburn ruled against the claimants on a number of issues of law and fact, rejecting the doctrine of aboriginal title in favor of terra nullius . Although Milirrpum was not appealed beyond the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory , it was overruled by the High Court of Australia two decades later in Mabo v Queensland No 2 1992 . Blackburn, in a confidential memorandum to the government and opposition, opined that a system of Aboriginal land rights was morally right and socially expedient . ref National Archives of Australia, confidential memorandum provided to government and opposition by Justice Blackburn urging the establishment of a statutory system of land rights, 1972, released 31 Dec 2001 ref The judgement concludes I cannot help being specially conscious that for the plaintiffs it is a matter in which their personal feelings are involved. ref 1971 71 FLR 141 at 293. ref Background main Native title in Australia In December 1968, the Yolngu people living in Yirrkala, Northern Territory Yirrkala , who were the traditional owners of the Gove Peninsula in Arnhem Land , obtained writs in the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory against the Nabalco Corporation, which had secured a twelve year bauxite mining lease from the Federal Government. Their goal was to establish in law their rightful claim to their homelands. The Yolngu people claimed they enjoyed legal and sovereignty sovereign rights over their land and sought declarations to occupy the land free from interference pursuant to their native title rights. The Yolngu people had petitioned the Australian House of Representatives in August 1963 in Australia 1963 with a Yirrkala bark petitions bark petition after the government sold part of the Arnhem ... rights . References reflist DEFAULTSORT Milirrpum v Nabalco Pty Ltd Category Native title ...   more details



  1. Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Wills

    Infobox Court Case name Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Wills court High Court of Australia image Australia coa.png date decided 30 September 1992 full name Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Wills citations http www.austlii.edu.au au cases cth HCA 1992 46.html 1992 177 CLR 1 judges Anthony Mason judge Mason CJ, Gerard Brennan Brennan , William Deane Deane , Daryl Dawson Dawson , John Toohey judge Toohey , Mary Gaudron Gaudron and Michael McHugh McHugh JJ prior actions none subsequent actions none opinions 7 0 The law in question was held to be invalid small per Mason CJ, Brennan, Deane, Dawson, Toohey, Gaudron & McHugh JJ small Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Wills 1992 177 Commonwealth Law Reports CLR 1 is a High Court of Australia case that deals with a number of issues regarding the Constitution of Australia Australian Constitution , including freedom of interstate intercourse Section 92 of the Australian Constitution section 92 , the implied freedom of political communication, and the role of proportionality. Background The Industrial Relations Act 1988 Cth made it an offence to bring the Australian Industrial Relations Commission into disrepute. Nationwide News published an article attacking the integrity and independence of the Commission. Nationwide News argued that the Act infringed the implied freedom of political communications, while the Commonwealth argued that the Act was valid under Section 51 xxxv of the Australian Constitution section 51 xxxv conciliation and arbitration power , as well as Section 51 xxxix of the Australian Constitution section 51 xxxix express incidental power . Decision Interstate intercourse Although it was not a decisive factor, it was argued that freedom of communication falls under freedom of interstate intercourse. Per Brennan J, the protection in section 92 is given to such things as the movement of people, goods and communications. The essential ingredient is that there is movement across State boundaries, although the movement need not be perceivable ...   more details



  1. Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd

    Infobox Court Case name Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd court High Court of Australia date decided 24 March 1994 full name Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd citations http www.austlii.edu.au au cases cth high ct 179clr520.html 1994 179 CLR 520 , http www.austlii.edu.au au cases cth HCA 1994 13.html & 091 1994& 093 HCA 13 judges Anthony Mason judge Mason CJ, Gerard Brennan Brennan , William Deane Deane , Daryl Dawson Dawson , John Toohey judge Toohey , Mary Gaudron Gaudron & Michael McHugh McHugh JJ prior actions Mabo v Queensland 1988 Mabo v The State of Queensland 1988 subsequent actions none opinions 5 2 Authority liable to General Jones under ordinary principles of negligence appeal dismissed. small per Mason CJ, Deane, Dawson, Toohey, Gaudron JJ small Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd 1994 179 CLR 520 is a tort law case from the High Court of Australia , which decided it would abolish the rule in Rylands v. Fletcher . Facts A fire, caused by an independent contractor s employee welding negligently, began on the defendant s premises and spread to a nearby property. The property was burnt. The plaintiff sued under nuisance , negligence and the rule in Rylands v. Fletcher . Judgment The High Court held that Rylands involved quite unacceptable uncertainty 540 . It said that Blackburn J s formulation had been all but obliterated by subsequent ... to a miscellany of disparate categories of cases and only with Heaven v. Pender 1883 11 QBD 503 and Donoghue v. Stevenson 1932 AC 562, 580 was liability grounded on general foreseeability 543 ... on the basis of Rylands v Fletcher principle. The grounds of nuisance and negligence were not appealed. Appealed to the High Court of Australia See also Transco plc v Stockport MBC External links http www.austlii.edu.au au cases cth HCA 1994 13.html Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd & 091 1994& 093 HCA 13 1994 179 CLR 520 1994 Aust Torts Reports 81 264 1994 120 ALR 42 1994 68 ...   more details



  1. Australian National Airways Pty Ltd v Commonwealth

    in Australian National Airways Pty Ltd v Commonwealth No 2 1946 71 Commonwealth Law Reports CLR 115. ref name Austlii 1946 HCA 10 AustralianNationalAirwaysPtyLtdvCommonwealth 2 Austliiref cite ... Airways Pty Ltd v Commonwealth No 2 publisher Austlii accessdate 8 April 2010 ref See also Two ...Australian National Airways Pty Ltd v Commonwealth No 1 1945 71 Commonwealth Law Reports CLR 29 most commonly known as Australian National Airways Pty Ltd v Commonwealth and also referred to as The Airlines Case or the ANA Case was a High Court of Australia decision. The case dealt with limits of the powers of the Australian Federal Government under sections Section 51 i of the Australian Constitution 51 and Section 92 of the Australian Constitution 92 of the Constitution of Australia Australian Constitution . The outcome of the case was that the Federal Government could found a federally owned airline , but it could not hinder private sector competition with that airline. Background In mid 1945, the Australian Labor Party Labor Federal Government of Prime Minister of Australia Prime Minister Ben Chifley introduced a Bill proposed law bill into in the Australian House of Representatives House of Representatives that would have the effect of nationalising interstate Airlines in Australia. ref name UQP 1987 Galligan PoliticsoftheHighCourt cite book last Galligan first Brian title Politics of the High Court publisher University of Queensland Press year 1987 chapter 4 accessdate 7 April 2010 ref At the time, Australian National Airways ANA was the dominant National airline domestic carrier in Australia. ref name UQP 1987 Galligan PoliticsoftheHighCourt After the bill received Royal assent Other Commonwealth realms Royal Assent as the Australian Airlines Act 1945 , ref name Documents ... 41.html title Australian National Airways Pty Ltd v Commonwealth No 1 Airlines Nationalisation case ... DEFAULTSORT Australian National Airways Pty Ltd V Commonwealth Category 1945 in Australia Category Australian ...   more details



  1. P J Magennis Pty Ltd v Commonwealth

    Infobox Court Case name P J Magennis Pty Ltd v Commonwealth court High Court of Australia image Australia coa.png date decided 21 December 1949 full name P J Magennis Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth citations http www.austlii.edu.au au cases cth HCA 1949 66.html 1949 80 CLR 382 judges John Latham jurist Latham CJ, George Rich Rich , Owen Dixon Dixon , Edward McTiernan McTiernan , Dudley Williams Williams and William Webb judge Webb JJ prior actions none subsequent actions none opinions 4 2 The law is invalid for not acquiring property on just terms small per Latham CJ, Rich, Williams & Webb JJ Dixon & McTiernan dissenting small P J Magennis Pty Ltd v Commonwealth 1949 80 Commonwealth Law Reports CLR 382 is a High Court of Australia case that deals with the Commonwealth s power of acquisition of property, which must be on just terms, as specified in section 51 xxxi of the Constitution of Australia Australian Constitution . The Commonwealth government wished to purchase land for resettlement after World War II . Because the States are not required to acquire property on just terms, the Commonwealth government entered into a deal with the New South Wales government, which would purchase the land for a lower price. The Commonwealth government would then pay the New South Wales government in the form of a grant Section 96 of the Australian Constitution section 96 The majority characterised the law as being one of acquiring real property, instead of the grants power. Consequently, the law was amended to remove references to the acquisition of property. This resulted in the later case of Pye v Renshaw . See also Section 51 of the Australian Constitution Australian constitutional law References George Winterton Winterton, G. et al. Australian federal constitutional law commentary and materials , 1999. LBC Information Services, Sydney. External links http www.austlii.edu.au au cases cth HCA 1949 66.html Full text of the decision Category High Court of Australia cases Category 1949 ...   more details



  1. Swift Australian Co (Pty) Ltd v Boyd Parkinson

    Infobox Court Case name Swift Australian Co Pty Ltd v Boyd Parkinson court High Court of Australia image Australian coat of arms 1912 edit.png date decided 8 August 1962 full name Swift Australian Co Pty Ltd v Boyd Parkinson citations http www.austlii.edu.au au cases cth high ct 108clr189.html 1962 108 CLR 189 judges Owen Dixon Dixon CJ, Edward McTiernan McTiernan , Frank Kitto Kitto , Alan Taylor jurist Taylor , Douglas Menzies Menzies , Victor Windeyer Windeyer and William Owen judge Owen JJ prior actions none subsequent actions none opinions 6 1 Regulation 5 of the Customs Act did not cover the regulation of mixed export and domestic meat producers. small per Dixon CJ, McTiernan, Kitto, Taylor, Menzies & Windeyer JJ small Swift Australian Co Pty Ltd v Boyd Parkinson 1962 108 Commonwealth Law Reports CLR 189 was a case decided in the High Court of Australia regarding the scope of the trade and commerce power in section 51 i of the Australian Constitution Constitution . Background Swift the appellant was a company incorporated in Queensland which conducted a business in the meat and meat exporting trade in that state and elsewhere. The company owned a building in Maryborough, Queensland Maryborough where it conducted a number of operations including the killing and treatment of poultry. It was registered under the Commonwealth Commerce Meat Export Regulations made under the Customs Act 1901 1960. It was registered as an establishment at which a long list of operations was allowed to take place, including the Slaughtering, chilling, freezing and storage of poultry for export . While Swift was in possession of a Commonwealth licence for the production and export of poultry, it did not have the relevant state licence for the same purpose, as mandated under the Poultry Industry Acts, 1946 to 1959 of the State of Queensland. Swift was subsequently convicted by a Court of Petty ... in the negative, distinguishing the case from O Sullivan v Noarlunga Meat Ltd , where all of the meat ...   more details



  1. Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v Commonwealth

    Use dmy dates date August 2010 Infobox Court Case name Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v Commonwealth italic title force court High Court of Australia image Australian coat of arms 1912 edit.png date decided 30 September 1992 full name Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd & Ors v Commonwealth New South Wales v Commonwealth & Anor citations http www.austlii.edu.au au cases cth high ct 177clr106.html 1992 177 CLR 106 , http www.austlii.edu.au au cases cth HCA 1992 45.html & 091 1992& 093 HCA 45 judges Anthony Mason judge Mason CJ, Gerard Brennan Brennan , William Deane Deane , Daryl Dawson Dawson , John Toohey judge Toohey , Mary Gaudron Gaudron & Michael McHugh McHugh JJ prior actions none subsequent actions none opinions 5 2 the Australian Constitution Constitution provides for a system of responsible government , and the right to free political communication is an indispensable part of that system small per Mason CJ, Brennan, Deane, Toohey & Gaudron JJ small 4 3 part IIID of the Broadcasting Act 1942 was invalid, because it contravened this implied right small per Mason CJ, Deane, Toohey & Gaudron JJ Brennan and McHugh JJ dissenting in part small Australian Capital Television v Commonwealth 1992 177 Commonwealth Law Reports CLR 106 was a significant court legal case case decided in the High Court of Australia on 30 September 1992. It concerned the constitutional validity of Part IIID of the Broadcasting Act 1942 , which regulated political advertising during election campaigns, and required broadcasters to broadcast political advertisements free of charge at other times. The High Court found the laws to be invalid, since they contravened an implied right to freedom of political communication note there is no guarantee of freedom of speech in the Australian Constitution . Background to the case In 1991, the Government of Australia the Commonwealth under Prime Minister ... Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd V Commonwealth Category Australian constitutional law ...   more details



  1. Deputy Federal Commissioner of Taxation (NSW) v W R Moran Pty Ltd

    orphan date January 2008 Infobox Court Case name Deputy Federal Commissioner of Taxation NSW v W R Moran Pty Ltd court High Court of Australia image Australia coa.png date decided 25 July 1939 full name The Deputy Federal Commissioner of Taxation New South Wales v W R Moran Proprietary Limited citations http www.austlii.edu.au au cases cth HCA 1939 27.html 1939 61 CLR 735 judges John Latham judge Latham CJ, George Rich Rich , Hayden Starke Starke , H.V. Evatt Evatt , and Edward McTiernan McTiernan JJ prior actions none subsequent actions none opinions 4 1 There is no constitutional limit to granting money in a discriminatory manner small per Latham CJ, Rich, Starke & McTiernan JJ Evatt J dissenting small Deputy Federal Commissioner of Taxation NSW v W R Moran Pty Ltd 1939 61 Commonwealth Law Reports CLR 735 is a High Court of Australia case that deals with whether Section 96 of the Australian Constitution section 96 is limited by Section 99 of the Australian Constitution section 99 , which prevents Commonwealth laws discriminating between States. In this case, the Commonwealth imposed a tax on flour millers, but reimbursed the States based on their production of wheat in order to reimburse the flour millers by 90 of their taxes. The problem is that Tasmania , while milling flour, does not produce wheat. The majority held that the taxation was valid since the tax applied equally to all States, and there was no constitutional impediment to granting money discriminately. Per Latham CJ, section 96 is a means by which the Commonwealth, when it thinks proper , can adjust inequalities between States. Thus, because there was no discrimination in taxation, yet grants are not subject to prohibitions based on discrimination, the majority held the laws to be valid. Evatt J, conversely, examined the scheme as a whole, and ruled it invalid. See also Australian constitutional law References George Winterton Winterton, G. et al. Australian federal constitutional law commentary and materials ...   more details



  1. Michell Pty Ltd

    unreferenced date December 2010 Michell Pty Ltd is a wool processing and tanning company based in Adelaide, South Australia . Founded in 1870 in the Mid North town of Undalya, South Australia Undalya by George Henry Michell , the company moved to the Adelaide suburb of Hindmarsh, South Australia Hindmarsh in 1896 and then again to the current site on Main North Road , Salisbury South, South Australia Salisbury South . Michell purchases almost 15 per cent of Australia s unprocessed wool and is still owned by the Michell family. There are processing plants in other parts of Australia and the world, with branch offices in the United States and China. The company has also branched out into banking, farming, commodity trading and property development. External links http www.michellwool.com Michell Pty Ltd website http www.fbasa hall of fame.com.au businesses michell.html Michell Pty Ltd in the Family Business Australia Hall of Fame Australia company stub Category Companies established in 1870 Category Companies based in Adelaide ...   more details



  1. Direct Group Pty Ltd

    Unreferenced date August 2010 Direct Group Pty Ltd is a holding company comprising three strands Direct Marketing, Direct Selling and Direct Television. The company owns TVSN and Expo Channel in Australia, along with a range of other related business. References See Wikipedia Footnotes on how to create references using ref ref tags which will then appear here automatically Reflist External links http www.directgroup.com.au Company website Category Television in Australia retail company stub ...   more details



  1. APDD Pty Ltd

    notability date February 2012 Refimprove date February 2012 APDD Pty Ltd is a construction company based in Melbourne , Victoria Australia Victoria Australia . They provide a range of services including project design, construction management and construction. In particular it claims to specialise in the design and delivery of complex, high quality commercial and hospital medical facilities. Origin APDD was originally the Melbourne branch of Austin Australia Pty Ltd, which was formed in 1961, was based in Sydney and which went into liquidation in 2004 ref http www.labor.net.au news 1073446482 15629.html ref . In 2003, shortly prior to liquidation of Austin Australia, the Melbourne branch office became the basis of a new Austin affiliate company. The entire entity was sold in 2004 by the liquidators, Ernst & Young , to the branch manager, Steve Fraser, who became it s managing director and has ran the company since. External Links http www.apdd.com.au APDD official website. References references Category Companies based in Melbourne Category Companies established in 2003 ...   more details



  1. Imparja Television Pty Ltd

    Use dmy dates date December 2010 Imparja Television Pty Ltd is a commercial television company servicing remote eastern and central Australia that began broadcasting on 2 January 1988. It is based in Alice Springs , where it has a studio and satellite uplink facility. Notably, it is controlled by Indigenous Australians Australian Aborigines and is widely regarded as a symbol of Aboriginal Australia. The company produces one channel, Imparja Television . From the late 1990s to 2007, it also produced an additional channel, the Aboriginal content on it becoming known as Indigenous Community Television ICTV , which was closed on the 12 July 2007 to make way for the National Indigenous Television service. Shareholders Central Australian Aboriginal Media Association CAAMA Central Land Council Tiwi Land Council Northern Land Council Warlpiri Media Association Pitjantjatjara Council Top End Aboriginal Bush Broadcasting Association TEABBA Maralinga Tjarutja Trust Commonwealth of Australia External links http www.imparja.com Official Website Category Television production companies of Australia Category Indigenous Australian culture Category Indigenous Australian media Category Media in Alice Springs Category Indigenous television ...   more details



  1. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.

    Infobox company company name Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. company type Public company Publicly traded ... &t 1 title Annual Report 2010 publisher Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. accessdate ... headquarters.jpg thumb Royal Caribbean headquarters Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. is a Norway Norwegian ... line operator, after Carnival Corporation & plc . As of March 2009, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. fully owns five cruise lines Royal Caribbean International , Celebrity Cruises , Pullmantur Cruises , Azamara Club Cruises and CDF Croisi res de France , plus has a 50 stake in TUI Cruises . ref cite ... accessdate 10 November 2008 date last first work publisher Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd ref ref cite web url http dougnewmanatsea.com 2008 04 30 celebrity galaxy to be tui cruises first ship title Celebrity Galaxy to Be TUI Cruises First Ship accessdate 10 November 2008 date 30 April 2008 last Newman first Doug work At Sea with Doug Newman publisher ref Previously Royal Caribbean Cruises also ... title Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. to Sell Its Interest in Island Cruises to First Choice Holidays Ltd. accessdate 10 November 2008 date 6 October 2008 last first work publisher Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd ref History Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. was formed in 1997 when Royal Caribbean Cruise Line ... Line was re branded Royal Caribbean International and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. was established ... Caribbean Cruise Ltd. Press Release ref TUI AG had previously become the owner of 50 of Island Cruises ... 1 , Mein Schiff 2 Former brands Island Cruises 50 share, owned 2000 2008 Other companies owned by RCCL ... of Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. OBXList Category Cruise lines Category Companies based in Miami, Florida Category Companies established in 1997 Category Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. de Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. et Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. es Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. no Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. ru Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. fi Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. sv Royal Caribbean Cruises ...   more details



  1. Milkor (Pty) Ltd

    Infobox Company company name Milkor Pty Ltd company logo foundation 1981 location Pretoria, South Africa Pretoria , South Africa key people Chairman Andries C Piek area served world wide industry weapon s manufacturing products Milkor 40mm UBGL , Milkor 37 38mm STOPPER convertible , Milkor 37 38mm Pistol , Milkor 40mm MGL Mk 1S , Milkor 40mm MGL Mk1L , Milkor 40mm MRGL , Milkor 37 38mm MAR , 37 38 and 40mm Accessories homepage http milkor.co.za index.html Milkor Pty Ltd Home http www.milkorusainc.com Milkor USA Milkor Pty Ltd is a privately owned South African company established in 1981. Milkor is very widely known for its 40mm range of Milkor MGL MGL s Multiple Grenade Launcher , used in more than 30 countries world wide. Although Milkor is best known for its 40mm MGLs, it has an array of 40mm products catering to the less lethal market, for infantry and for special forces applications. Products Milkor 40mm UBGL Milkor 37 38mm STOPPER convertible Milkor 37 38mm Pistol Milkor 40mm MGL Mk 1S Milkor 40mm MGL Mk1L Milkor 40mm MRGL Milkor 37 38mm MAR 37 38 and 40mm Accessories Users flag Brazil flag Chile flag Colombia 200 units. flag Croatia Croatia s K K Metallic produces an unlicensed version of the MGL, known as the RBG 6 Ru nih Baca a Granata . flag Denmark flag India flag Malaysia flag Mexico flag Peru Acquired approx. 668 launchers. flag South Africa flag Sri Lanka ref http defencewire.blogspot.com 2008 03 why special forces so deadly.html ref flag United States Employed by the United States Marine Corps as the M32 MGL. See also Commons Milkor MGL Milkor MGL CZW SAG 30 SAG 30 Hawk MM 1 References reflist External links http www.milkor.co.za Milkor Pty Ltd Home http www.janes.com articles Janes Infantry Weapons Milkor MGL Mk 1S 40 mm six shot multiple grenade launcher South Africa.html Milkor MGL Mk 1S 40 mm six shot multiple grenade launcher South Africa http www.janes.com articles Janes Infantry Weapons Milkor MGL Mk 1L 40 mm six shot multiple grenade launcher South ...   more details



  1. O'Sullivan v Noarlunga Meat Ltd (No 2)

    Orphan date July 2011 Infobox Court Case name O Sullivan v Noarlunga Meat Ltd No 2 court High Court of Australia image Australian coat of arms 1912 edit.png date decided 13 October 1956 full name O Sullivan v Noarlunga Meat Ltd No 2 citations http www.austlii.edu.au au cases cth high ct 94clr367.html 1956 94 CLR 367 judges Owen Dixon Dixon CJ, Dudley Williams Williams , William Webb judge Webb , Wilfred Fullagar Fullagar and Frank Kitto Kitto JJ prior actions O Sullivan v Noarlunga Meat Ltd 1954 92 CLR 565 subsequent actions none opinions 5 0 The Court rejected an application to appeal to the Privy Council from the previous case. small per Dixon CJ, Williams, Webb, Fullagar & Kitto JJ small O Sullivan v Noarlunga Meat Ltd No 2 1956 94 Commonwealth Law Reports CLR 367 was a High Court of Australia case, in which a certificate, under s 74 of the Constitution of Australia Australian Constitution , was sought for leave to appeal to the Privy council Privy Council against the previous decision of O Sullivan v Noarlunga Meat Ltd . In the preceding case, it was held that the Commonwealth s extensive regulations regarding premises used for the slaughtering of livestock for export were valid under Section 51 i of the Australian Constitution s 51 i of the Constitution. It was argued in this case that it was a necessary consequence of the decision that all production, regardless of whether it was intended for home or foreign consumption, would be regulated. Dixon CJ, Williams, Webb and Fullagar JJ wrote a joint judgment denying the certificate of appeal, and reaffirmed the limitations to the power expressed by Fullagar J in the preceding case. Kitto J concurred. See also Section 51 i of the Australian Constitution Australian constitutional law References George Winterton Winterton, G. et al. Australian federal constitutional law commentary and materials , 1999. LBC Information Services, Sydney. External links http www.austlii.edu.au au cases cth high ct 94clr367.html Full text ...   more details



  1. London Underground Ltd v Edwards (No 2)

    Infobox Court Case name London Underground Ltd v Edwards No 2 court Employment Appeal Tribunal image caption date decided full name citations judges prior actions subsequent actions opinions transcripts keywords London Underground Ltd v Edwards No 2 1997 IRLR 157 is a leading discrimination case relevant for UK labour law , concerning objective justification of indirect discrimination. Facts Ms Edwards, a single parent, could not keep up child care after the Underground altered its shift system. She had worked as a train driver for ten years. The Tribunal held that they could have easily, without losing the objectives of their plan and reorganisation, have accommodated the applicant who was a long serving employee They did not address themselves to these issues Judgment Morison J dismissed the employer s appeal. It may be that London Underground would have wished to implement the single parent link but gave in to pressure from their predominantly male workforce. First, he said, the more clear it is that the employers unreasonably failed to show flexibility in their employment practices, the more willing the tribunal should be to make a finding of unlawful discrimination. Second, employers can change rosters, but should carefully consider the impact which a new roster might have on a section of their workforce. Third, nothing said here should be construed as favouring positive discrimination. See also Clist directdiscrim Clist justification UK labour law EU labour law Notes refs 2 References External links Category United Kingdom labour case law ...   more details



  1. Morgan Finance Pty Ltd.

    Infobox company company name Morgan Finance Pty Ltd. company logo File Morgan Finance Logo.jpg company type Privately held parent foundation 2005 founder location city Sydney , New South Wales location country Australia slogan key people industry Finance Fast Finance area served Australia No. of offices worldwide products revenue net income num employees subsid homepage http www.morganfinance.com.au www.morganfinance.com.au footnotes Morgan Finance is a Australia n company based in Sydney , which specializes in fast financial services. ref name morganfinance1 cite web author Administrator url http www.morganfinance.com.au Resources r the establishment of morgan finance.php title The Establishment of publisher Morgan Finance date accessdate 2012 03 14 ref It was established in the year 2005. Morgan Finance arranges fast finance for clients who need urgent funds, whilst assisting in the provision of necessary information and documents to reach a settlement. Morgan Finance specialize fast finance, and claims to have served thousands of satisfied customers Australia wide. History Morgan Finance Pty Limited was established in 2005 in Sydney as a fast finance provider. The business idea arose when the director was processing a client s loan application, which had the opportunity to purchase stock form a liquidator well under assigned value but could not access immediate funding to do so. According to the company, their aim is to provide immediate funding for customers to access irresistible investment opportunities or consumer needs, to cover unpredictable expenses or simply to fund for a surprise holiday. ref name morganfinance1 Morgan Finance serves thousands of customers every year Australia wide, and is considered a leading company in fast business and personal loans. Morgan Finance has office in Sydney as head office, Melbourne and Brisbane Office. ref http www.anz.com Documents AU Aboutanz values HTMLNewsletter0507 A4 V2.pdf ref Services Morgan Finance is registered ...   more details




Articles 1 - 25 of 1605572          Next


Search   in  
Search for Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd (No 2) in Tutorials
Search for Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd (No 2) in Encyclopedia
Search for Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd (No 2) in Videos
Search for Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd (No 2) in Books
Search for Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd (No 2) in Software
Search for Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd (No 2) in DVDs
Search for Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd (No 2) in Store


Advertisement




Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd (No 2) in Encyclopedia
Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd (No 2) top Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd (No 2)

Home - Add TutorGig to Your Site - Disclaimer

©2011-2013 TutorGig.info All Rights Reserved. Privacy Statement