Utilitarianism , see Utilitarianism book . For the architectural theory, see Utilitarianism architecture Cleanup link rot date October 2011 Duplication article yes dupe Consequentialism UtilitarianismUtilitarianism is an ethical theory holding that the proper course of action is the one that maximizes ... are Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill . Utilitarianism was described by Bentham as the greatest ... Utilitarianism can be characterised as a quantitative and reductionist approach to ethics. It is a type ... Qinglai Sheng title A defense of utilitarianism url http books.google.com books?id AZF 5t PhbMC&pg ... of consequentialism . Types of utilitarianism Hedonism Rules Act vs rule Unreferenced section date June 2011 Main Act utilitarianism Rule utilitarianism Act utilitarianism states that, when faced ... at all times. The distinction between act and rule utilitarianism is therefore based on a difference .... Rule utilitarianism has been criticized for advocating general rules that, in some specific ... rule utilitarianism to act utilitarianism and makes rules meaningless. Rule utilitarians ... defense is legally justified, while murder is not. However, within rule utilitarianism there is a distinction between the strictness and absolutism of this particular branch of utilitarianism. Strong Rule Utilitarianism is an absolutist theory, which frames strict rules that apply for all people and all time and may never be broken. John Stuart Mill proposed Weak Rule utilitarianism, which posits ... would produce the most happiness. Rule utilitarianism should not be confused with heuristics rules ... much doubt, however, the rules of thumb can be ignored. Collapse of rule utilitarianism into act utilitarianism It has been argued that rule utilitarianism collapses into act utilitarianism, because for any ... of Utilitarianism , 1965 ref This process holds for all cases of exceptions, and so the rules have ... Promises , in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy . ref Two level Main Two level utilitarianism ... more details
Utilitarianism Refimprove date June 2011 Act Utilitarianism is a utilitarian theory of ethics which states that, when faced with a choice, we must first consider the likely consequences of potential actions and, from that, choose to do what we believe will generate the most pleasure. ref Fieser, J. 2009 . Ethics. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy , Retrieved from http www.iep.utm.edu ethics ref Act utilitarianism is opposed to rule utilitarianism , which states that the morally right action is the one that is in accordance with a moral rule whose general observance would create the most happiness. Act utilitarianism will use the summary concept as opposed to the practice concept. The summary concept means that the rule is a generalization that a class of actions, such as the keeping of promises, is good. Jeremy Bentham presented one of the earliest fully developed systems of utilitarianism. According to act utilitarianism, it would be morally wrong to waste time on leisure activities such as watching television, since our time could be spent in ways that produced a greater social benefit, such as charity work. But prohibiting leisure activities doesn t seem reasonable. More significantly, according to act utilitarianism, specific acts of torture or slavery would be morally permissible if the social benefit of these actions outweighed the disbenefit. ref Fieser, J. 2009 . Ethics. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy , Retrieved from http www.iep.utm.edu ethics ref See also Portal Philosophy Rule utilitarianism Two level utilitarianism Preference utilitarianism Jeremy Bentham John Stuart Mill Peter Singer References Reflist DEFAULTSORT Act Utilitarianism Category Utilitarianism Category Ethical theories ethics stub et Teoutilitarism zh ... more details
John Stuart Mill s book Utilitarianism is a philosophy philosophical defense of utilitarianism in ethics ... ethical principles in other works such as On Liberty and The Subjection of Women , Utilitarianism ... What Utilitarianism Is Of the Ultimate Sanction of the Principle of Utility Of What Sort of Proof ... two chapters, Mill aims to define precisely what utilitarianism claims in terms of the general ... of utilitarianism, as well as to defend it against philosophical criticisms, most notably ... by appeals to experience. He identifies utilitarianism as one of the empirical theories ... 16 ref Utilitarianism, therefore, can only attain its goal of greater happiness by cultivating the nobleness of individuals so that all can benefit from the honour of others. In fact, notes Mill, Utilitarianism ... the volume, Mill writes mainly as if addressing opponents of utilitarianism, but here he is trying ... with a discussion of problems concerning utilitarianism, as well as the concept of justice. Critics of utilitarianism often claim that judging actions solely in terms of their consequences is incompatible ... objection to utilitarianism and sets out to argue that a binding concept of justice can be explained ... and music. We can clarify what Mill means by utilitarianism by comparing and contrasting it with Aristotle ... text Utilitarianism Mill can claim that the proof for the principle of utility is the fact that it is human ... reflist Bibliography cite book author Mill, John Stuart title Utilitarianism publisher University ... links wikisource Utilitarianism http www.utilitarianism.com mill1.htm Full Text, Version of Utilitarianism.com http www.archive.org details a592840000milluoft Mill, J.S. Utilitarianism . Parker ...?id nSUCAAAAQAAJ&dq editions OCLC38110333&lr &source gbs summary s&cad 0 Mill, J.S. Utilitarianism ... gbs summary s&cad 0 Mill, J.S. Utilitarianism , third edition. Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer London, 1867 , a digitized copy from Google Book Search . http www.earlymoderntexts.com Contains Utilitarianism ... more details
Utilitarianism Preference utilitarianism is one of the most popular forms of utilitarianism in contemporary philosophy. Citation needed date November 2010 Unlike classical utilitarianism, which defines right actions as those that maximize pleasure and minimize pain, preference utilitarianism promotes actions that fulfill the interests preferences of those beings involved. fact date February 2012 The beings may be rational agent rational , that is to say, their interests may be carefully selected based on future projections, but this is not compulsory here, the definition of party extends to all sentient beings, even those living solely in the present. clarifyme Why does party need to be defined here? date February 2012 ref name Krantz2002 cite book author Susan F. Krantz title Refuting Peter Singer s ethical theory the importance of human dignity url http books.google.com books?id H923FD34 9MC&pg PA28 accessdate 30 November 2010 date January 2002 publisher Greenwood Publishing Group isbn 9780275970833 pages 28 29 ref Since what is good and right depends solely on individual preferences, there can be nothing that is in itself good or bad for preference utilitarians, the source of both morality and ethics in general is subjective preference. ref name Krantz2002 Preference utilitarianism therefore can be distinguished by its acknowledgement that every person s experience of satisfaction is unique. The theory, as outlined by R. M. Hare in 1981, is controversial, insofar as it presupposes some basis by which a conflict between A s preferences and B s preferences can be resolved for example ... of preference utilitarianism and himself influenced by the views of Hare, has been criticised for giving ... pages 95 ref See also Portal Philosophy Rule utilitarianism Act utilitarianism Two level utilitarianism ... Consequentialism SEP http lesswrong.com lw 9oa against utilitarianism sobels attack on judging ... Preference Utilitarianism Category Utilitarianism Philosophy stub de Pr ferenzutilitarismus sk ... more details
Utilitarianism Rule utilitarianism is a form of utilitarianism that says actions are moral when they conform to the rules that lead to the greatest good, or that the rightness or wrongness of a particular action is a function of the correctness of the rule of which it is an instance. ref name Garner and Rosen cite book last Garner first Richard T. coauthors Bernard Rosen title Moral Philosophy A Systematic Introduction to Normative Ethics and Meta ethics year 1967 publisher Macmillan Publishers Macmillan location New York isbn 0023405805 page 70 ref For rule utilitarians, the correctness of a rule is determined by the amount of good it brings about when followed. In contrast, act utilitarians judge actions in terms of the goodness of their consequences without reference to rules of action. clarifyme How does this imply that act utilitarians determine the correctness of a rule differently? date February 2012 Another variation of rule utilitarianism stresses the greater utility of following a given rule in general, arguing that the practice of following some rule in all instances always stopping at red lights, for example will have better consequences overall than allowing exceptions .... cn span Rule utilitarianism can also be seen as practice rule, which states that&mdash even though ... 1861 book Utilitarianism book Utilitarianism , John Stuart Mill defends the concept of rights ... Mill title Utilitarianism book Utilitarianism year 1861 ref Whether Mill was a rule utilitarian ... criticism of rule utilitarianism states that it collapses into act utilitarianism . David Lyons ref Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism , 1965. ref argued that collapse occurs because for any ... . ref See also Act utilitarianism Two level utilitarianism John Stuart Mill Richard Brandt Brad ... last Smart first J. J. C authorlink J. J. C. Smart title Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism publisher ... and Philosophy DEFAULTSORT Rule Utilitarianism Category Utilitarianism de Regelutilitarismus et Reegliutilitarism ... more details
Userspace draft source ArticleWizard date January 2011 No footnotes date April 2011 Relative Utilitarianism Let math X math be a set of possible states of the world or alternatives society wishes to choose some state from math X math . Let math I math be a finite set, representing a collection of people. For each math i in I math , let math u i X longrightarrow mathbb R math be a utility utility function . A social choice theory social choice rule or voting system is a mechanism which uses the data math u i i in I math to select some element s from math X math which are best for society. The basic problem of social choice theory is to disambiguate the word best . The classic utilitarianism utilitarian social choice rule selects the element math x in X math which maximizes the utilitarian sum center math U x sum i in I u i x . math center However, for this formula to make sense, we must assume that the utility functions math u i i in I math are both cardinal utility cardinal , and social choice theory Interpersonal utility comparison interpersonally comparable at a cardinal level. The notion that individuals have cardinal utility functions is not that problematic. Cardinal utility has been implicitly assumed in decision theory ever since Daniel Bernoulli s analysis of the Saint Petersburg Paradox . Rigorous mathematical theories of cardinal utility with application to risky decision making were developed by Frank P. Ramsey , Coherence philosophical gambling strategy Bruno de Finetti ... of the different individuals. Relative utilitarianism proposes a natural calibration mechanism ... social choice function, relative utilitarianism has been analyzed by Cao 1982 , Dhillon 1998 ... Dhillon first1 Amrita title Extended Pareto rules and relative utilitarianism journal Social Choice ... Jean Francois title Relative utilitarianism journal Econometrica volume 67 number 3 year 1999 ... pages 569 589 Citation last1 Sobel first1 Joel title Manipulation of preferences and relative utilitarianism ... more details
orphan date January 2010 Basic interests utilitarianism is a variant of utilitarian theory first described by Charles Jones . ref Jones, Charles, Global Justice Defending Cosmopolitanism, Ch 2 ref References references DEFAULTSORT Basic Interests Utilitarianism Category Utilitarianism Philosophy stub ... more details
UtilitarianismUtilitarianism states that the quality of consciousness conscious experience is important .... date February 2012 Two alternative answers to this problem are provided by average and total utilitarianism. Total utilitarianism Total utilitarianism is a method of applying utilitarianism to a group .... The main problem for total utilitarianism is the mere addition paradox , which argues that a likely outcome of following total utilitarianism is a future where there is a large number of people ... model of total utilitarianism, total utilitarians have two choices. They may either assert that higher ... of life. Total utilitarianism is also challenged by Nozick s utility monster , a hypothetical being ... that is seen as completely immoral. Citation needed This appears to be a criticism of utilitarianism in general, not specific to total utilitarianism date February 2012 Average utilitarianism Average utilitarianism values the maximization of the arithmetic mean average utility among a group ... 3B2 J Average Utilitarianism requires subscription ref So a group of 100 people each with 100 Felicific ... hedons each. More counter intuitively still, average utilitarianism evaluates the existence of a single ... utility of 99 hedons. Average utilitarianism may lead to repugnant conclusions if practiced strictly ... conclusion mentioned above is avoided by average utilitarianism, some generally repugnant conclusions ..., then strict average utilitarianism seems to support killing off the 99 hedon society this violent action ... criticism. Average utilitarianism seems to reject what Parfit calls mere addition the addition or creation ... an immoral act. The hazards of average utilitarianism are potentially avoided if it is applied more ... of Rule utilitarianism or else Two level utilitarianism may temper the aforementioned undesirable ... would almost certainly cause suffering in the long run. Alternatively, average utilitarianism may ... who would be better off dead . This would also allow average utilitarianism ... more details
Utilitarianism Two level utilitarianism is a Utilitarianism utilitarian theory of ethics developed by R .... ref Traditional utilitarianism treats this as a claim that people should try to ensure that their actions ... 1 . In Utilitarianism . London Longmans, Green and Company, 130. ref Two level utilitarianism is virtually a synthesis of the opposing doctrines of act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism . Act utilitarianism states that in all cases the morally right action is the one which produces the most pleasure, whereas rule utilitarianism states that the morally right action is the one that is in accordance ... level utilitarianism, act utilitarianism can be likened to the critical level of moral thinking, and rule utilitarianism to the intuitive level. ref name Hare b R. M. Hare Hare, R. M. 1976 . Ethical theory and utilitarianism . In H. D. Lewis ed. , Contemporary British Philosophy IV . London Allen & Unwin, 122 5 ref Utilitarianism Main UtilitarianismUtilitarianism is a type of consequentialist ... with deontology , according to which moral actions flow from duties or motives . Utilitarianism ... archives spr2007 entries consequentialism ref The two predecessor theories to two level utilitarianism, act and rule utilitarianism, were beset by various objections. For example, rule utilitarianism ... that would obviously not maximise utility. Conversely, act utilitarianism was criticized for not allowing ... consequentialism rule ref Two level utilitarianism Image with inadequate rationale removed Image RMHare.jpg thumb right R. M. Hare Two level utilitarianism can be seen as an attempt to bypass objections ... avoiding the problems that affected act utilitarianism. ref name Hare 1981 f cite book last Hare ... and utilitarianism . In H. D. Lewis ed. , Contemporary British Philosophy IV . London Allen & Unwin ... made of utilitarianism in general, there are several criticisms made specifically against two level utilitarianism. One objection is that two level utilitarianism undermines an agent s commitment ... more details
Dolor may refer to Pain Suffering The unit of measurement in utilitarianism , see Felicific calculus Hedons and dolors disambig Long comment to avoid being listed on short pages sk Dolor ... more details
Utilitarianism expanded Problems The utility monster is a thought experiment in the study of ethics . It was created by philosopher Robert Nozick in 1974 as a criticism of utilitarianism . In the thought experiment, a hypothetical being is proposed who receives as much or more utility from each additional unit of a resource he consumes as the first unit he consumes. In other words, the utility monster is not subject to diminishing marginal returns with regard to utility, but instead experiences constant marginal returns, or even increasing marginal returns. Since ordinary people receive less utility with each additional unit consumed, if the utility monster existed, it would justify the mistreatment and perhaps annihilation of everyone else, according to the doctrine of utilitarianism. fact date February 2012 Robert Nozick believes that Utilitarian theory is embarrassed by the possibility of utility monsters who get enormously greater sums of utility from any sacrifice of others than these others lose . . . the theory seems to require that we all be sacrificed in the monster s maw, in order to increase total utility. ref Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia 1974 ref This thought experiment attempts to show that utilitarianism is not actually egalitarian , even though it appears to be at first glance. It is the opposite of the mere addition paradox , which argues that utilitarianism may lead to a very heavily populated cn span dystopic date February 2012 world. See also Average and total utilitarianism References reflist Category Utilitarianism Category Thought experiments in ethics lt Laim s monstras ... more details
saved book title subtitle cover image cover color Ideology Ideology Classical liberalism Social liberalism Social democracy Neoliberalism Christian democracy Communism Communitarianism Conservatism Fascism Feminism Green politics Islamism Libertarianism Nationalism Socialism Utilitarianism Progressivism ... more details
Telishment is a term coined by John Rawls to illustrate a problem of the Utilitarianism utilitarian view of punishment . Telishment is an act by the authorities of punishing a suspect in order to deter future wrongdoers, even though they know that the suspect is in fact innocent. The concept is put forward as a challenge to utilitarianism and consequentialism as theories of ethics . If supporters of these theories believe in the effectiveness of telishment as a deterrent, opponents claim that they must bite the bullet and also hold that telishment is ethically justified. Sources The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy , telishment See also Punishment The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas Category Ethics Category Utilitarianism Category Punishment ... more details
Rule egoism is the doctrine under which an individual evaluates the optimal set of rules according to whether conformity to those rules bring the most benefit to himself. ref Kagan, Shelly. 1998. Normative Ethics. Westview Press. p. 199 ref References Reflist See also Enlightened self interest Ethical egoism Indirect self interest Psychological egoism Rational egoism Rule utilitarianism Virtue ethics Category Ethical theories ... more details
Population ethics is the philosophy philosophical study of the ethics ethical problems concerning population . See also Average and total utilitarianism Mere addition paradox Overpopulation External links http www.repugnant conclusion.com index.html Population Ethics, Aggregate Welfare, and the Repugnant Conclusion http plato.stanford.edu entries repugnant conclusion The Repugnant Conclusion in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy philosophy stub Category Demography Category Ethics ... more details
other people William Shaw William H. Shaw William Harry Shaw was born on July 31, 1948 and is a professor and former Chair of the Philosophy Department at San Jose State University . He is the author of Marx s Theory of History A Defense, Business Ethics , 4th ed., Moral Issues in Business , 8th ed. with Vincent Barry , and Contemporary Ethics Taking Account of Utilitarianism . See also American philosophy Ethics Business ethics Utilitarianism List of American philosophers External links http falcon.tamucc.edu sencerz Shaw The Nature of Morality.htm The Nature of Morality by William Shaw Persondata Metadata see Wikipedia Persondata . NAME Shaw, William ALTERNATIVE NAMES SHORT DESCRIPTION DATE OF BIRTH 1948 PLACE OF BIRTH DATE OF DEATH PLACE OF DEATH DEFAULTSORT Shaw, William Category Living people Category 1948 births Category American philosophers ... more details
to outcome utilitarianism. He then proceeds to criticize outcome utilitarianism by criticizing ... Social welfare Social welfare function Welfare economics Utilitarianism Utility Juvenile delinquency References references Bibliography Amartya Sen , Utilitarianism and Welfarism in The Journal of Philosophy ... more details
Utilitarianism This is an incomplete list of advocates of utilitarianism and or consequentialism . 18th Century David Hume Jeremy Bentham ref Essay on Utilitarianism, Long Version , in Amnon Goldworth ed. , Deontology together with A table of the springs of action and the Article on Utilitarianism , Oxford Clarendon Press, 1983. ref James Mill 19th Century John Austin legal philosophy John Austin ref The Province of Jurisprudence Determined , London, 1832. ref Harriet Taylor Mill John Stuart Mill ref Utilitarianism , London, 1863. ref Henry Sidgwick ref The Methods of Ethics , London Macmillan, 1907, 7th edition. ref 20th Century G.E. Moore Bertrand Russell ref The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell , London Routledge, 2000 London Allen and Unwin, 1969, Vol. 1 , p. 39 It appeared to me obvious that the happiness of mankind should be the aim of all action, and I discovered to my surprise that there were those who thought otherwise. Belief in happiness, I found, was called Utilitarianism, and was merely one among a number of ethical theories. I adhered to it after this discovery. . ref obvious Karl Popper R. M. Hare ref Ethical Theory and Utilitarianism , in H. D. Lewis, Contemporary British Philosophy , Vol. 4, London Allen and Unwin. ref Richard Brandt ref A Theory of the Good and the Right , Amherst Prometheus, 1998. ref J. J. C. Smart ref An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics , in J. J. C. Smart and B. Williams, Utilitarianism For and Against , Cambridge Cambridge University ... We Are The New Science of Evolutionary Psychology , Vintage, 1995, p. 341 although utilitarianism ... Perrot, 1983. ref Fred Feldman philosopher Fred Feldman ref Hedonism, Utilitarianism, and Desert ..., arguing that our intuitions are more consistent with the practice of hedonistic utilitarianism than ... and Utility , Baltimore Johns Hopkins Press, 1967. ref Yew Kwang Ng ref An Argument for Utilitarianism ... , New York Oxford University Press, 1996. ref Torbj rn T nnsj ref Hedonistic Utilitarianism , Edinburgh ... more details
Refimprove date September 2007 Proportionalism is an ethical theory that lies between consequentialism teleological or consequentialism consequential theories and deontological theories. consequentialism Teleological or consequentialism consequential theories, like utilitarianism , say that an action is right or wrong, depending on the consequences it produces, whereas deontological theories, like The Categorical Imperative , say that actions are either intrinsically right or intrinsically wrong. Proportionalist theories like rule utilitarianism , however, say it is never right to go against a principle unless a proportionate reason would justify it. 1960s Proportionalism is a consequentialist attempt to develop Natural Moral Law , a Catholic deontological Moral absolutism absolutist theory by Thomas Aquinas . The moral guidelines set down by the Roman Catholic teachings of Natural Moral Law are mostly upheld in that intrinsically evil acts are still classified so. In certain situations where there is a balance of ontic good s and ontic evil s ontic evils are those that are not immoral but merely cause pain or suffering, ontic goods are those that alieviate pain or suffering . Proportionalism asserts that one can determine the right course of action by weighing up the good and the necessary evil caused by the action. As a result, Proportionalism aims to choose the lesser of evils. Pope John Paul II rules out the 1960s Proportionalism in his encyclicals Veritatis Splendor , promulgated in 1993 cf. section 75 , and in Evangelium Vitae , 1995 cf. article 68 . Instead, John Paul II, offers an ethics of beatitude. Category Ethical theories Philosophy stub ... more details
Unreferenced date December 2009 Orphan date October 2006 att March 2011 The informed judge is a concept that 19th century political philosophy political philosopher John Stuart Mill used when describing utilitarianism . Mill posited that in order to find the better of two choices, one must find the choice that yields more happiness. One does so, according to Mill, by finding an informed judge, who is simply someone who has experienced both options, and whichever choice the informed judge prefers will presumably be the better one. DEFAULTSORT Informed Judge Category Judges ... more details
New Way may refer to tocright Political ideology New Way Poland Direct Democracy , Voluntaryism , Social Capitalism , Minarchism , Utilitarianism Political parties New Way Israel , a short lived political faction in Israel in 2001 New Way Turkey , the Turkish section of the reunified Fourth International Publications New Way Naujas Kelias , a Neo Nazi Publication in Lithuania Towns New Way, Essex, United Kingdom, a hamlet near Harlow Music New Way To Light Up an Old Flame , a single by American country music artist Joe Diffie disambiguation Category Political party disambiguation pages ... more details
Alastair Norcross is an Associate Professor of philosophy specializing in normative ethics , applied ethics , and political philosophy . In 2007, he transferred to University of Colorado at Boulder from Rice University , where he had been since 2002, after teaching for ten years at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, where he was the Easterwood Associate Professor of Philosophy. Before that, he taught at Hobart and William Smith Colleges in Geneva, NY , while finishing his Ph.D. at Syracuse University in 1991. He is a descendant of William Wallace . In ethics, Norcross defends a version of act utilitarianism known as scalar utilitarianism , which is the theory that there are no right or wrong actions, only better or worse actions ranked along a continuum from the action or actions that contributes most to overall utility to the action or actions that contributes the least. Selected works 2006 Scalar Act Utilitarianism . In Henry R. West ed. Blackwell Guide to Mill s Utilitarianism . ISBN 978 1 4051 1949 8 2006 Reasons Without Demands Rethinking Rightness . In Jamie Dreier ed. Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory . ISBN 978 1 4051 0179 0 2005 Peacemaking Philosophy or Appeasement? Sterba s Argument for Compromise . International Journal of Applied Philosophy ,19 2. 2005 Contextualism for Consequentialists . Acta Analytica , 20 2 . 2005 Harming in Context . Philosophical Studies , 123 1 2 . 2004 Puppies, Pigs, and People Eating Meat and Marginal cases . Philosophical Perspectives 18. 2003 Killing and Letting Die . In R. G. Frey and Christopher Heath Wellman eds. , The Blackwell Companion to Applied Ethics 451 463. 2002 Contractualism and Aggregation . Social Theory and Practice , 28 2 303 314. 1999 Intransitivity and the Person Affecting Principle . Philosophy and Phenomenological Research , LIX 3 769 776. 1998 Great Harms from Small Benefits Grow How Death can be Outweighed by Headaches . Analysis 152 158. References http spot.colorado.edu norcross Norcrosscv.ht ... more details
Wikify date December 2010 David Lyons is a professor of Philosophy and Professor of Law at Boston University. His Ph.D. is from Harvard University . He is a specialist in ethics and jurisprudence. Publications Books Moral Aspects of Legal Theory Essays on Law, Justice and Political Responsibility. Cambridge Cambridge university press, 1999. ISBN 9780521432443 ISBN ref WorldCat ref Translated into Spanish as Aspectos morales de la teoria juridica ensayos sobre la ley, la justicia y la responsabilidad pol tica ISBN 9788474326017 Mill s Utilitarianism Critical Essays editor Lanham Md. Rowman & Littlefield, 1997. ISBN 9780847687831 ref http www.worldcat.org title mills utilitarianism critical essays oclc 37397916&referer brief results WorldCat ref Rights, Welfare, and Mill s Moral Theory . New York Oxford University Press, 1994.ISBN 9780195082180 ref http www.worldcat.org title rights welfare and mills moral theory oclc 28966786&referer brief results WorldCat ref Ethics and the Rule of Law. Cambridge Cambridgeshire Cambridge University Press, 1984. ISBN 9780521277129 Held in over 1000 worldCat libraries. ref http www.worldcat.org title ethics and the rule of law oclc 009620294 WorldCat ref Translated into Polish as Etyka i rz dy prawa ISBN 9788372610584 Rights. editor The Wadsworth series in social philosophy. Belmont, Calif Wadsworth Pub. Co, 1979. ISBN 9780534006006 ref http www.worldcat.org title rights oclc 003933410 WorldCat ref Translated into Spanish as tica y derecho ISBN 9788434415218 In the Interest of the Governed A Study in Bentham s philosophy of utility and law. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1973. ISBN 9780198245032 ref http www.worldcat.org title in the interest of the governed a study in benthams philosophy of utility and law oclc 000701215 WorldCat ref Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism. Oxford Clarendon Press, 1965. ISBN 9780198241973 ref http www.worldcat.org title forms and limits of utilitarianism oclc 000350922 WorldCat ref References Reflist External ... more details
on the grounds that it gives rise to these puzzles. Ethics In ethics , Smart is a defender of utilitarianism . Specifically, he defends extreme , or act utilitarianism , as opposed to restricted , or rule utilitarianism . The distinction between these two types of ethical theory is explained in his essay Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism . ref J.J.C. Smart, http www.jstor.org sici?sici 0031 8094 195610 6 3A25 3C344 3AEARU 3E2.0.CO 3B2 1 Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism , The Philosophical ..., this essay lays out a good clear, readable presentation of act utilitarianism. ref Smart gives two arguments against rule utilitarianism. According to the first, rule utilitarianism collapses into act utilitarianism because there is no adequate criterion on what can count as a rule . According ... is sometimes called preference utilitarianism . Smart s arguments against rule utilitarianism ... during the late 20th century. Worldwide, his defence of act utilitarianism and preference theory has ... entries in the Philosophical Lexicon refers to his approach to the consequences of act utilitarianism ... Utilitarianism , The Philosophical Quarterly , Oct., 1956, pages 344 354. An Outline of a System ... of Science , 1968. Utilitarianism For and Against co authored with Bernard Williams 1973 Ethics, Persuasion ... more details
benefits to the better off. Prioritarianism Distinct from Utilitarianism To further sharpen the difference between utilitarianism and prioritarianism, imagine a two person society its only members are Jim ... than utilitarianism when it comes to these kinds of cases, especially because of the prioritarian ... advantages over utilitarianism and radical egalitarianism as noted above , prioritarianism also avoids ... monistic utilitarianism like hedonistic utilitarianism is not fully mechanized and perhaps not even ... more details
Encyclopedia
top
