SCOTUSCase Litigants Miami Herald PublishingCo. v. Pat Tornillo ArgueDate April 17 ArgueYear 1974 DecideDate June 25 DecideYear 1974 FullName Miami Herald Publishing Company, Division of Knight Newspapers, Incorporated v. Tornillo USVol 418 USPage 241 Citation 94 S. Ct. 2831 41 L. Ed. 2d 730 1974 U.S. LEXIS 86 1 Media L. Rep. 1898 Prior Appeal from the Supreme Court of Florida Subsequent Holding The Court overturned a Florida state law requiring newspapers to allow equal access to political candidates in the case of a political editorial or endorsement content. SCOTUS 1972 1975 Majority Burger JoinMajority unanimous Concurrence Brennan JoinConcurrence Rehnquist Concurrence2 White LawsApplied First Amendment to the United States Constitution U.S. Const. amend. I The Miami Herald Miami Herald PublishingCo. v. Tornillo , Case citation 418 U.S. 241 1974 , was a Supreme Court of the United States United States Supreme Court case that overturned a Florida state law requiring newspapers to allow equal space in their newspapers to political candidates in the case of a political editorial or endorsement content. The Court held that while the statute does not prevent newpapers from saying anything they wish it exacts a penalty on the basis of the content. Because newspapers are economically finite enterprises, editors may conclude that the safe course is to avoid controversy, thereby chilling speech. Furthermore, the Court held the exercise of editorial judgment is a protected First Amendment ... Co. v. FCC represents the medium with the least protection Broadcast, TV, and radio. See also Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 418 Fairness doctrine Right of reply External links caselaw source case Miami Herald PublishingCo. v. Tornillo , 418 U.S. ... case.aspx?case Miami Herald Publishingv Tornillo First Amendment Library entry on Miami Herald PublishingCo. v. Tornillo US1stAmendment press state expanded DEFAULTSORT Miami Herald PublishingCo. V ... more details
Unreferenced date December 2009 Infobox Court Case name Masses PublishingCo. v. Patten court United States District Court for the Southern District of New York image USDCSDNY.jpg imagesize imagelink imagealt caption full name Masses PublishingCo. v. Patten date decided July 24, 1917 citations Case citation 244 F. 535 S.D.N.Y. 1917 transcripts judges Learned Hand prior actions subsequent actions opinions keywords Masses PublishingCo. v. Patten , Case citation 244 F. 535 S.D.N.Y. 1917 , was a decision by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York , that addressed advocacy of illegal activity under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution First Amendment . Background In cases such as Abrams v. United States , 250 U.S. 616 1919 and Gitlow v. New York , 268 U.S. 652 1925 and others, the United States Supreme Court struggled to draw the line between politically unpopular speech and actual threats to national security. Masses PublishingCo. v. Patten greatly influenced the Supreme Court s eventual adoption in Brandenburg v. Ohio of the incitement test for advocacy of illegal activity. At issue in Masses PublishingCo. v. Patten was the federal Espionage Act of 1917 , which prohibited citizens from counseling or advising violation of the law. The Court found that the New York postmaster s refusal to allow circulation of an antiwar journal under the statute violated the First Amendment. Opinion Learned Hand wrote the opinion To assimilate agitation, legitimate as such, with direct incitement to violent resistance, is to disregard the tolerance of all methods of political agitation which in normal times is a safeguard of free government. Judge Hand affirmed that if a citizen stops short of urging upon others that it is their duty or their interest to resist the law, then he or she is protected by the First Amendment. One may, for example ... PublishingCo. V. Patten Category 1917 in United States case law Category United States Free Speech ... more details
SCOTUSCase Litigants Curtis PublishingCo. v. Butts ArgueDate February 23 ArgueYear 1967 DecideDate June 12 DecideYear 1967 FullName Curtis Publishing Company v. Wally Butts USVol 388 USPage 130 Citation 94 S. Ct. 2997 41 L. Ed. 2d 789 1974 U.S. LEXIS 88 1 Media L. Rep. 1633 Prior Certiorari Cert. to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Subsequent No. 37, 351 F.2d 702, affirmed No. 150, 393 S.W.2d 671, reversed and remanded Holding Libel damages may be recoverable in this instance against a news organization if the injured party is a non public official but claimants must demonstrate a reckless lack of professional standards on the part of the organization in examining allegations for reasonable credibility. SCOTUS 1965 1967 Plurality Harlan JoinPlurality Clark, Stewart, Fortas Concurrence Warren Concurrence Dissent Black JoinConcurrence Dissent Douglas Concurrence Dissent2 Brennan JoinConcurrence Dissent2 White LawsApplied First Amendment to the United States Constitution U.S. Const. amend. I wikisource Curtis Publishing Company v. Butts Curtis PublishingCo. v. Butts , 388 U.S. 130 1967 ref ussc Source f 388 130 1967 ref , was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States established the standard of First Amendment to the United States Constitution First Amendment protection against defamation claims brought by private individuals. The decision held that, while news organizations were protected from liability when printing allegations about public official s under the Supreme Court s New York Times Co. v. Sullivan decision 1964 , they may still be liable to public figure s if the information they disseminate is recklessly gathered and unchecked. ref http www.oyez.org cases 1960 1969 1966 1966 37 ref The decision was the result of a slander ... Curtis DEFAULTSORT Curtis PublishingCo. V. Butts Category United States Supreme Court cases Category ... of the venerable Saturday Evening Post and its parent corporation, the Curtis Publishing Company ... more details
WestMead may refer to WestMead Township, Crawford County, Pennsylvania , a township in the United States USS WestMead ID 3550 , also Westmead , a United States Navy cargo ship in commission from 1918 to 1919 See also Westmead disambig ... more details
Infobox SCOTUS case Litigants Times Picayune PublishingCo. v. United States ArgueDate March 11 ArgueYear 1953 DecideDate May 24 DecideYear 1953 FullName Times Picayune PublishingCo. v. United States USVol 345 USPage 594 Citation 73 S.Ct. 872 Prior Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana Subsequent Holding A publisher selling only combined insertions appearing in both its morning and evening papers does not violate the Sherman Act SCOTUS 1949 1953 Majority Clark JoinMajority Vinson, Reed, Frankfurter, Jackson Dissent Burton JoinDissent Black, Douglas, Minton LawsApplied Times Picayune PublishingCo. v. United States , Case citation 345 U.S. 594 1953 , is an antitrust law decision by the United States Supreme Court . In a 5 4 decision it held that a tie in sale of morning and evening newspaper advertising space does not violate the Sherman Antitrust Act , because there was no market dominance in the tying product. ref cite journal last Turner first Donald F. year 1958 title The Validity of Tying Arrangements under the Antitrust Laws journal Harvard Law Review volume 72 issue 1 pages 50 75 jstor 1338363 ref See also List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 345 Northern Pacific R. Co. v. United States 1958 , a similar case Jefferson Parish Hospital Dist. No. 2 v. Hyde 1984 , a case involving tying arrangements United States v. Loew s Inc. 1962 , a case on product bundling References Reflist Further reading cite journal last Markovits first Richard S. year 1967 title Tie ins, Reciprocity, and the Leverage Theory journal Yale Law Journal volume 76 issue 7 pages 1397 1472 jstor 794828 cite journal last Wollenberg first Keith K. year 1987 title An Economic Analysis of Tie In Sales Re Examining the Leverage Theory journal Stanford Law Review volume 39 issue 3 pages 737 760 jstor 1228764 DEFAULTSORT Times Picayune PublishingCo. v. United States Category 1953 in United States case law Category United States antitrust case law ... more details
Wikify date November 2011 Macaulay v Schroeder Music PublishingCo Ltd. was a judicial decision of the Judicial functions of the House of Lords House of Lords relating to restraint of trade. Summary Restraint of trade exclusive services agreement whether unreasonable Abstract In determining the enforceability of a contract in restraint of trade the court will consider the fairness of the bargain having regard to whether the restrictions are both reasonably necessary for the protection of the legitimate interests of the promisee and commensurate with the benefits secured by the promisor. The plaintiff, an unknown songwriter aged 21, entered into standard form agreement with the defendant publishers who were to have the exclusive benefit of the plaintiff s compositions, the full world copyright whereof was assigned to the defendants in return for a fixed percentage of any royalties received. The term of the agreement was expressed to be five years, which term was to be automatically extended by a further five years if the royalties payable to the plaintiff within the first five years should exceed GBP 5,000. The defendants could terminate or assign the benefit of the agreement whereas the plaintiff could do neither. There was no obligation upon the defendants under the agreement to publish or promote any composition of the plaintiff. The plaintiff obtained a declaration that the agreement was void as contrary to public policy. Held , dismissing the defendant s appeal, that the standard form agreement could not be justified as moulded under the pressures of negotiation, competition and public opinion, the plaintiff having no bargaining power as against the defendants that the defendants could under the agreement arbitrarily decline to exploit the plaintiff s work in which event the plaintiff s remuneration under the agreement would be limited to a GBP 50 advance payable thereunder ... E.R. 171 affirmed Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Harper s Garage Stourport Ltd 1968 A.C. 269 considered . Judge ... more details
Infobox court case name Glen Gould Estate v. Stoddart PublishingCo. Ltd. court Ontario Court of Appeal image Glenn Gould 1.jpg imagesize imagelink imagealt caption full name date decided 1998 05 06 citations 1998 , 39 OR 555, 161 DLR 4th 321, http www.canlii.org en on onca doc 1998 1998canlii5513 1998canlii5513.html 1998 CanLII 5513 transcripts judges Finlayson, Krever and Weiler JJ.A. number of judges 3 decision by Finlayson J.A. prior actions appealed from Ontario Superior Court of Justice , 1996 , 30 OR 3d 520, http canlii.ca en on onsc doc 1996 1996canlii8209 1996canlii8209.html 1996 CanLII 8209 appealed to subsequent actions related actions opinions keywords copyright, misappropriation of personality, public interest italic title Gould Estate v. Stoddart PublishingCo. Ltd. 1998 , 39 OR 555 Ont CA , is a Law of Canada Canadian case on appropriation of personality , the ownership of copyright , and requirements of fixation . Background During 1956, Jock Carroll interviewed a young Glenn Gould for an article in Montreal Star Weekend Magazine . Carroll documented much of the encounter, he took pictures of Gould, wrote notes and took an audio recording of the interview. All of this was permitted by Gould. The article was eventually published under the title I Don t Think I m at All Eccentric ref Carroll, Jock. I Don t Think I m at All Eccentric, Says Glenn Gould , Weekend Magazine Toronto Telegram , 7 July 1956, 6 11. ref . In 1995, after Gould s death, Carroll published a book called Glenn Gould Some Portraits of the Artist as a Young Man ref Carroll, Jock. Glenn Gould Some Portraits of the Artist as a Young Man . Stoddart Publishing, 1996. ISBN 978 0773729049 ref that contained nine photographs from the 1956 interview, as well the narrative of the books was largely based on the notes and recording and contained many quotations by Gould. The estate of Glenn Gould brought ... it would otherwise be denied. See also Krouse v. Chrysler Canada Ltd. References reflist External links ... more details
SCOTUSCase Litigants Central Green Co. v. United States ArgueDate October 30 ArgueYear 2000 DecideDate February 21 DecideYear 2001 FullName Central Green Corporation v. United States USVol 531 USPage 425 Citation 531 U.S. 425 2001 Prior On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Subsequent Holding The term flood or flood waters within the Flood Control Act of 1928 includes water that is released for a flood control purpose SCOTUS 1994 2005 Majority Stevens JoinMajority unanimous Concurrence JoinConcurrence Dissent JoinDissent Dissent2 Dissent3 LawsApplied Flood Control Act of 1928 Central Green Co. v. United States , http www.law.cornell.edu supct html 99 859.ZS.html 531 U.S. 425 2001 , was a Supreme Court of the United States United States Supreme Court case decided in 2001. The case concerned the meaning of the words flood or flood waters within the Flood Control Act of 1928 . The Court concluded that the law did not always apply to federal flood control facilities. Background Central Green Co. owned 1,000 acres of pistachio orchards in California s San Joaquin Valley. The Madera Canal flowed through their property. In 1996, they brought a suit ... cases 2000 2009 2000 2000 99 859 argument DEFAULTSORT Central Green Co. V. United States Category ... or flood waters . Central Green Co. appealed and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. It agreed with Central Green that the Madera Canal serves no flood control purpose , but nevertheless held that immunity attached solely because it is a branch of the Central Valley Project . ref http scholar.google.com ... Control Act of 1928 Legislative intent References reflist External links Caselaw source case Central Green Co. v. United States , 531 U.S. 425 2001 findlaw http laws.findlaw.com us 531 425.html justia ... at 429. ref Central Green appealed again, this time to the United States Supreme Court , which certiorari ... v. United States 1986 , the Court found the phrase floods or flood waters encompassed waters released ... more details
Infobox Court Case name Hutton vWest Cork Railway Co court Court of Appeal image Chetwynd Viaduct.JPG date decided full name citations 1883 23 Ch D 654 judges prior actions subsequent actions opinions Bowen LJ, Cotton LJ and Baggallay LJ dissenting transcripts keywords Insolvency, provision for employees Hutton vWest Cork Railway Co 1883 23 Ch D 654 is a UK company law case, which concerns the limits of a director s discretion to spend company funds for the benefit of non shareholders. It was decided in relation to employees in the context of a company s insolvency proceedings. The case s practical significance was limited by cases and statute as in Re Horsley & Weight Ltd , ref 1982 Ch 442 ref where the Court of Appeal held that a company s substantive object may include making gifts, and under CA 2006 section 172 which entitles and obliges directors to regard interests other than shareholders as a proper exercise of their power. Facts According to the law report, ref 1883 LR 23 Ch D 654 ref cquote A railway company which had no provision in its articles for paying remuneration to directors, and had never paid any, sold its undertaking to another company at a price to be determined by an arbitrator. By the Act authorizing the transfer it was provided that on the completion of the transfer the company should be dissolved except for the purpose of regulating their internal affairs and winding up the same and of dividing the purchase money. The purchase money was to be applied ... adherence to serving only the shareholders. Evans v Brunner, Mond and Co Ltd 1921 1 Ch 359 ... was too remote. But he lost. AP Smith Manufacturing Cov Barlow , 39 ALR 2d 1179 1953 the court ... interest. See now, section 172 Companies Act 2006 . Subsequent case law Miles v Sydney Meat Preserving Co 1912 16 Commonwealth Law Review 50, 19 Argus Law Review 70 affirmed on other grounds ... its high obligations as a constituent of our modern society. Regentcrest plc v Cohen 2001 ... more details
Infobox SCOTUS case Litigants West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish ArgueDateA December 16 ArgueDateB 17 ArgueYear 1936 DecideDate March 29 DecideYear 1937 FullName West Coast Hotel Company v. Ernest Parrish, et ux. USVol 300 USPage 379 Citation 57 S. Ct. 578 81 L. Ed. 703 1937 U.S. LEXIS 1119 1 Lab. Cas. CCH P17,021 8 Ohio Op. 89 108 A.L.R. 1330 1 L.R.R.M. 754 7 L.R.R.M. 754 Prior Judgment for defendant, Chelan County, Washington Chelan County Washington Superior Court Superior Court , November 9, 1935 reversed, 55 Pacific Reporter P.2d 1083 Washington Supreme Court Wash. 1936 Subsequent None Holding Washington s minimum wage law for women was a valid regulation of the right to contract freely because of the state s special interest in protecting their health and ability to support themselves. Supreme Court of Washington affirmed. SCOTUS 1932 1937 Majority Hughes JoinMajority Brandeis, Stone, Roberts, Cardozo Dissent Sutherland JoinDissent Van Devanter, McReynolds, Butler LawsApplied Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution U.S. Const. amend. XIV Minimum Wages for Women Act, 1913 Wash. Laws 174 West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish , ussc 300 379 1937 , was a decision by the Supreme ... 422 23 ref See also Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 Notes Reflist 2 External links wikisource West Coast Hotel Company v. Parrish caselaw source case West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish , 300 U.S. 379 ... decision in Adkins v. Children s Hospital , ussc 261 525 1923 . The decision is usually regarded as having ... working at the Cascadian Hotel in Wenatchee, Washington owned by the West Coast Hotel Company , along ... groups, as in the case of Muller v. Oregon , ussc 208 412 1908 , where the Court had found in favor ... to decades of Court invalidation of economic regulation, exemplified in Lochner v. New York , ussc 198 45 1905 . West Coast Hotel represents the end of that trend, and came about through an unexpected ... v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo . ref name gloriousr cite book title The Glorious Burden The American ... more details
Wikify date January 2012 SCOTUSCase Litigants Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. Pettus ArgueDateA April 14 ArgueDateB April 15 ArgueYear 1884 DecideDate January 5 DecideYear 1885 FullName Central of Georgia Railway Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. Pettus USVol 113 USPage 116 Citation Prior .... ref http supreme.justia.com us 113 116 case.html Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v ... Dissent2 JoinDissent2 LawsApplied Central of Georgia Railway Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. Pettus , ussc 113 116 1885 , was an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of the United States ... Central Railroad Banking Company of Georgia v. Pettus http supreme.justia.com us 113 116 case.html ... the railroad formerly belonging to the Montgomery and West Point Railroad Montgomery and West Point Railroad Company , an Alabama corporation, and which extends from Montgomery to West Point, with a branch ... other property of the Montgomery and West Point Railroad Company, one of the terms and conditions ..., in exchange for stock of the Montgomery and West Point Railroad Company outstanding. It was a part ... to it by the Montgomery and West Point Railroad Company , to secure the payment of ,200,000 of bonds ..., the surviving trustees in the mortgages executed by the Montgomery and West Point Railroad .... On the 8th of May, 1875, Branch, Sons & Co., H. P. Hoadely, and C. S. Plank&mdash holding bonds of the old Montgomery and West Point Railroad Company not secured by mortgage&mdash through ... the present appellants, the Western Railroad Company, the Montgomery and West Point Railroad Company ... that the unsecured creditors of the Montgomery and West Point Railroad Company, to which class complainants ... and West Point Railroad Company that were outstanding and unpaid, but superior to that of the mortgage ... of the Montgomery and West Point Railroad Company was covered by that mortgage, and that the property ... and to such other unsecured creditors of the Montgomery and West Point Railroad Company as should ... more details
SCOTUSCase Litigants Central R. Co. of N. J. v. Mills ArgueDateA January 13 ArgueDateB 14 ArgueYear DecideDate February 2 DecideYear 1885 FullName Central Railroad of New Jersey Central R. Co. of N. J. v. Mills USVol 113 USPage 249 Citation Prior Subsequent Holding SCOTUS 1882 1887 Majority JoinMajority LawsApplied Central R. Co. of N. J. v. Mills , 113 U.S. 249 1885 , involved a case where the United States Court of Claims Court of Claims had dismissed a petition of the claimants, regarding the rejection of two items sued for 1 labor done and materials furnished by the claimants in constructing the coffer dams, and in performing the work necessarily connected therewith and preliminary to the masonry work for the piers and abutments, 2 loss and damages resulting to the claimants in consequence of the reduction of the dimensions of the piers and abutments made subsequently to the making of the contract. ref http supreme.justia.com us 113 243 case.html Central R. Co. of N. J. v. Mills, 113 U.S. 249 1885 Justia.com ref Background The decision of the United States Court of Claims Court of Claims in regard to item 1 was that the claimants had not shown that the written contract did not express the intent of both parties as to the coffer dams, and that even if that court were satisfied that the claimants executed the contract in mistake of their rights, there was no evidence that the defendants shared the mistake. Its decision in regard to item 2 was that it would be disposed to regard the case, on the facts, as one for equitable interposition for the purpose of further inquiry and the ascertainment of the rights of the parties in equity if it had jurisdiction, but that the statute did not authorize it to entertain those considerations, because, in the proceedings before it, it could hear and determine only claims for labor done and materials furnished by the claimants under ... case law Category Central Railroad of New Jersey ... more details
Infobox SCOTUS case Litigants Citizens Sav. & Trust Co. v. Illinois Central R. Co. ArgueDateA December 3 ArgueDateB 4 ArgueYear 1906 DecideDate March 4 DecideYear 1907 FullName Citizens Sav. & Trust Co. v. Illinois Central R. Co. USVol 205 USPage 46 Citation Prior Subsequent Holding SCOTUS 1906 1909 Majority JoinMajority Concurrence JoinConcurrence Dissent NotParticipating LawsApplied Citizens Sav. & Trust Co. v. Illinois Central R. Co. , ussc 205 46 1907 , was a suit brought in the circuit court of the United States for the eastern district of Illinois against the Illinois Central Railroad Company, the Belleville & Southern Illinois Railroad Company, the St. Louis, Alton, & Terre 205 U.S. 46, 47 Haute Railroad Company, all Illinois corporations to be hereafter called, respectively, the Illinois, the Belleville, and Terre Haute companies , and the United States Trust Company, a New York corporation. The lastnamed corporation was never served with process and did not appear in the suit. ref http supreme.justia.com us 205 46 Citizens Sav. & Trust Co. v. Illinois Central R. Co., 205 U.S. 46 1907 Justia.com ref The case presents a question as to the jurisdiction of the court below. The plaintiff, an Ohio corporation, was the holder of 400 shares of the common stock of the Belleville company ..., in substance, that certain deeds were illegally and fraudulently procured by the Illinois Central ... the Illinois Central Railroad Company has done, is doing and, unless restrained, will continue ... ordering the defendant, the Illinois Central Railroad Company, to account for and pay over to the Belleville ... to cover each fiscal year, or part thereof, from the time when the Illinois Central Railroad Company ... powers of such receivers and that the Illinois Central Railroad Company, through its officers and agents ... Company, and that the Illinois Central Railroad, Company be ordered to account to such receiver, as is hereinbefore prayed. That the defendant, the Illinois Central Railroad Company, its officers ... more details
Infobox SCOTUS case Litigants Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City ArgueDate April 17 ArgueYear 1978 DecideDate June 26 DecideYear 1978 FullName Penn Central Transportation Company, et al. v ... Retrospective on Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York. 13 William & Mary Bill of Rights ... P, 2001. PENN CENTRAL TRANSP. CO. V. NEW YORK CITY. No. 438 U.S. 104. US Supreme Court. 26 June 1978 ..., Stevens LawsApplied Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution U.S. Const. amend. V Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City , ussc 438 104 1978 was a landmark Supreme Court of the United ... Rail Industry Bot generated title ref Early Proposals to Replace Grand Central Terminal In 1954 New York Central Railroad began to look at proposed plans to replace the Grand Central Terminal . Early ... www.nyc architecture.com MID MID031.htm New York Architecture Images Grand Central Terminal Bot generated ... all plans to replace Grand Central Terminal were abandoned. The Pan Am Building In 1958 Erwin S. Wolfson created proposals to replace Grand Central Terminal s six story office building just north of the Terminal ... in 1963 and bought Grand Central Terminal more time away from proposed reconstructions. New York Central Railroad Merger with Pennsylvania Railroad Despite increased office space, New York Central ... income. In 1968 New York Central Railroad merged with Pennsylvania Railroad to create the Penn Central Railroad company. The newly formed Penn Central began to look into updating the uses of the Grand Central Terminal in order to increase revenue and save the company from financial straits. ref http pcrrhs.org history.html Penn Central Railroad Historical Society Bot generated title ref Plans to Build on Top of Grand Central Terminal In mid 1968 Penn Central Railroad unveiled two designs by Marcel Breuer one of which would potentially be built atop Grand Central Terminal. The first design Breuer I was a 55 story tall office building to be constructed on top of Grand Central. This building ... more details
SCOTUSCase Litigants Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. ArgueDate February 8 ArgueYear 1950 DecideDate April 24 DecideYear 1950 FullName Mullane, Special Guardian, v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., Trustee, et al. USVol 339 USPage 306 Citation 70 S. Ct. 652 94 L. Ed. 865 1950 U.S. LEXIS 2070 Prior on writ of certiorari from the New York Court of Appeals 299 N.Y. 697, 87 N.E.2d 73, reversed. Subsequent Holding Notice of judicial proceedings must be reasonably calculated to reach those who are known to be affected by such proceedings. SCOTUS 1949 1953 Majority Jackson JoinMajority Vinson, Black, Reed, Frankfurter, Minton, Clark Dissent Burton NotParticipating Douglas LawsApplied Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution U.S. Const. amend. XIV , New York State Banking Law 100 c wikisource Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Company Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. , Case citation 339 U.S. 306 1950 , ref http caselaw.lp.findlaw.com scripts getcase.pl?navby CASE&court US&vol 339&page 306 339 U.S. 306 Full text of the opinion courtesy of Findlaw.com. ref was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States set forth the constitutional requirements ... risk management for smaller trusts. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. in New York City was the Management ... cite journal last Hayward first Marvin C. year 1950 title The Effect of Mullane v. Central Hanover ... three years thereafter. In March 1947, Central Hanover petitioned the New York Surrogate .... When the fund had just been started, however, Central Hanover sent notice by mail of the future ... and terminating any rights the beneficiaries may have had against Central Hanover for mismanagement ... pages 47 60 jstor External links http www.lawnix.com cases mullane central hanover bank.html Case Brief for Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank and Trust at Lawnix.com DEFAULTSORT Mullane V. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. Category United States Supreme Court cases Category United States civil due process ... more details
Variable datapublishing VDP also known as database publishing is a term referring to the output of a variable composition system. While these systems can produce both electronically viewable and hard copy print output, the variable datapublishing term today often distinguishes output destined for electronic viewing, rather than that which is destined for hard copy print eg. variable data printing . Essentially the same techniques are employed to perform variable datapublishing, as those utilized with variable data printing. The difference is in the interpretation for output. While variable data printing may be interpreted to produce various print streams or page description files eg. Advanced Function Presentation AFP IPDS , PostScript , Printer Command Language PCL , variable datapublishing ..., integrity between those output channels often becomes important. Variable datapublishing ... power utilized. Origin of the concept The term variable datapublishing was likely an offshoot of the term variable data printing , first introduced to the printing industry by Frank Romano, Professor ... . Variable data composition involves the use of data to conditionally exhibit text static blocks and or variable ... data may be as simple as an address block or salutation. However, it can be any or all of the document ... words, it can make up as little or as much of the document as the composer desires. Variable data ... data can be used to build rule based design schemes, including fonts, colors, and page formats. The possibilities are vast. The variable data tools available today, make it possible to perform variable data composition at nearly every stage of document production. However, the level of control ... data tool is deployed. For example, if variable data insertion occurs just prior to output...it s not likely ... pages, emails, and mobile messaging. See also Variable data printing Mass customization Dynamic publishing Print on demand Category Databases Category Digital press Category Documents Category Publishing ... more details
Triangle Music PublishingCo., Inc. was an United States American publisher of popular music based in New York City. It was founded in 1919 by Joseph Medford Davis 1896 1978 , with the help of George F. Briegel 1890 1968 , a former bandmaster at the Pelham Bay Naval Station. ref Triangle Co. Progressing, The Music Trades, pg. 42, February 15, 1919 ref Davis created the firm to rival black publishers. He, himself, was white. Davis issued mostly blues and popular songs written by blacks. Davis dropped the Triangle imprint in the 1930s and replaced it with Joe Davis, Inc. He sold the firm in 1939 and went into the record manufacturing business, becoming a major independent record salesman as well. His songwriters included Fats Waller , Andy Razaf , Chris Smith composer Chris Smith , Chris Smith composer Alex Hill , Paul Denniker, Spencer Williams , Carson Robison , J. C. Johnson , Claude Hopkins , ref http books.google.com books?id 65zkcD3O6w8C&pg PA374&lpg PA374&dq 22triangle music publishing 22 22Joseph M. davis 22&source bl&ots UjWH9jcNlg&sig BbZI5fHbmu7IiS8MDz Z6w66diY&hl en&ei dxizTsW3DsXy0gHP aHXBA&sa X&oi book result&ct result&resnum 2&ved 0CB8Q6AEwAQ v onepage&q 22triangle 20music 20publishing 22 20 22Joseph 20M. 20davis 22&f false David A. Jason, Tin Pan Alley An Encyclopedia of the Golden Age of American Song , pg. 374, Taylor & Francis 2003 LCCN 2003002699 ISBN 0415938775 ISBN 9780415938778 ref Wilbur Sweatman , and Victor Arden . References reflist Category Music publishing companies of the United States Category Companies based in New York City Category Publishing companies established in 1919 ... more details
Judaic PublishingCo. was an antisemitic publishing entity controlled by Henry Hamilton Beamish , an Irish born antisemite. In 1920 Beamish took over the publication of The Jewish Peril from Eyre & Spottiswoode , and published it under the imprint of The Britons . Subsequently this entity was effectively merged by Beamish and his associates into the Britons Publishing Company http books.google.com books?id nqACzm2XB3gC&pg PA44&dq 22Judaic publishing company 22&sig DhSz6uV5Bt7pNcLnMiQz6hTPVAE , which continued disseminating antisemitic propaganda http www.yale.edu isps seminars antisemitism Shain.pdf . The British Library has three imprint s by this entity which are listed below. Works The Jews Who s Who. Israelite finance its sinister influence Judaic PublishingCo. London, 1920 pp. 255 The Jews who s who. Israelite finance its sinister influence ... Popular edition by Henry Hamilton Beamish London Judaic PublishingCo., 1921 pp. 255. 18 cm. Letters from Palestine, February April, 1922 Bessie Pullen Burry Judaic PublishingCo. London, 1922 pp. 137. References Sharman Kadish , Bolsheviks and British Jews, The Anglo Jewish Community, Britain and the Russian Revolution , London , 1992 http books.google.com books?id rhkA1VpX5KQC&pg PA39&dq 22Judaic publishing company 22&sig XTQcr19KR8Dc2Gd eeILn FLrYY PPA38,M1 . Richard C. Thurlow , Fascism in Britain From Oswald Mosley s Blackshirts to the National Front http books.google.com books?id nqACzm2XB3gC&pg PA44&dq 22Judaic publishing company 22&sig DhSz6uV5Bt7pNcLnMiQz6hTPVAE DEFAULTSORT Judaic Publishing Company Category Antisemitism in the United Kingdom Category British fascist movements Category Political pressure groups of the United Kingdom Category Book publishing companies of the United Kingdom Category Political book publishing companies publish company stub ... more details
Unreferenced date March 2009 Hainaim PublishingCo., Ltd. is one of the largest book publishing publishers in South Korea . The company publishes original Korean works, and also cooperates with major English language publishers and literary agencies to publish English and other titles in South Korea. Their Korean language best sellers include the novels The Taeback Mountains by Jo Jung rae which sold 4,500,000 copies, and Moo kung hwa Has Blossomed by Kim Jin Myung which sold 4,000,000 copies. The company s translated English titles include He s Just Not That Into You by Greg Behrendt, Love Letters of Great Men by John Kirkland, Comet by Carl Sagan and Ann Druyan , and the Chicken Soup for the Soul series. External links http www.hainaim.com Official Website In Korean Category Companies of South Korea ... more details
dethome.html Library of Congress Detroit PublishingCo. ref A large collection of photographic and photomechanical ... Detroit PublishingCo. portrait at the Library of Congress Capter II William Henry Jackson and the Detroit Publishing Company , in Jack Davis and Dorothy Ryan Samuel L. Schmucker The Discovery ... books?vid ISBN0615111866&id pRYRbRqkyhwC&dq 22detroit publishing 22 Google books small Commons category Detroit PublishingCo. External links http memory.loc.gov detroit dethome.html Library of Congress Detroit PublishingCo. homepage Touring turn of the century America photographs from the Detroit Publishing Company, 1880 1920 . http beinecke.library.yale.edu digitallibrary america.html ... companies based in Michigan photography stub cs Detroit Publishing ... more details
Dorrance Publishing Company is the oldest United States American independent vanity press , which identifies itself as a subsidy publishing company . It was founded in 1920 by Philadelphia , Pennsylvania publisher Gordon Dorrance to publish the works of new authors. Several authors got their start with Dorrance, including A.R. Ammons who won the 1972 National Book Award . Dorrance has also published the works of many African American authors. As a subsidy based publishing firm, the writer is expected to pay for the cost of the first 1000 copies of his her book as part of the publishing contract. This is often viewed in a very negative light by writers and writing groups, most of whom advise against working with a publisher that charges any kind of fee. You can send your book proposal to the page of dorrance publishing for free and they will check it. Dorrance Publishing is currently located in Pittsburgh . External links http www.dorrancepublishing.com Dorrance Publishing website Category Book publishing companies based in Pennsylvania Category Publishing companies established in 1920 Category Companies based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania publishing stub ... more details
Arena Publishing Company was an American book and magazine publishing firm of the late nineteenth century, founded by author and editor B. O. Benjamin Orange Flower. ref American Antiquarian Society and Research Libraries group, Bibliography of American Imprints to 1901 , New York, K. G. Saur, 1993. ref Headquartered in Copley Square in Boston , the firm specialized in fiction and non fiction books on the progressive causes of the 1890s. Though in existence for only a short period, from 1890 to 1896, Arena issued books by several important progressive figures of the time. ref Roger Eliot Stoddard, Vanity and Reform B. O. Flower s Arena Publishing Company, Boston, 1890&ndash 1896, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America , Vol. 76 No. 3 1982 , pp. 273 337. ref The firm has been called the notoriously radical Arena Publishing Company. ref Donald Pizer, Hamlin Garland s Early Work and Career , Berkeley, University of California Publications, 1960 p. 144. ref Arena released books on political and economic reform and progressive religious movements including books written by Flower . The company s promotional materials advertised important books for thoughtful people on progressive modern thought and effort. It issued a number of the Utopian and dystopian fiction utopian novels that were a prominent feature of American literature in the late nineteenth century, ref Kenneth M. Roemer, The Obsolete Necessity America in Utopian Writings, 1888&ndash 1900 , Kent, OH, Kent State University Press, 1976. ref ref Jean Pfaelzer, The Utopian Novel in America, 1886&ndash 1896 The Politics ... and science fiction. Arena Publishing Company of Boston published twenty or more fantastic fiction ... 1894 Solomon Schindler , Young West 1894 Castello Holford , Aristopia 1895 John McCoy, A Prophetic ... printing format of black ink on white paper caused eyestrain Schindler s Young West , a sequel ... Publishing companies of the United States Category Publishing companies established in 1890 Category ... more details
Infobox settlement official name Mead, West Virginia settlement type Unincorporated community nickname motto Images image skyline imagesize image caption image flag image seal Maps image map mapsize map caption image map1 mapsize1 map caption1 pushpin map West Virginia Location coordinates region US WV subdivision type List of countries Country subdivision name United States subdivision type1 Political divisions of the United States State subdivision name1 West Virginia subdivision type2 List of counties in West Virginia County subdivision name2 Raleigh County, West Virginia Raleigh Government government footnotes government type leader title leader name leader title1 leader name1 established title established date Area unit pref area footnotes area magnitude area total km2 area land km2 area water km2 area total sq mi area land sq mi area water sq mi Population population as of population footnotes population total population density km2 population density sq mi General information timezone Eastern Time Zone Eastern EST utc offset 5 timezone DST EDT utc offset DST 4 elevation footnotes elevation m elevation ft 1768 latd 37 latm 37 lats 28 latNS N longd 81 longm 15 longs 38 longEW W ... ref cite gnis 1543037 Mead ref blank1 name blank1 info website footnotes Mead is an unincorporated community in Raleigh County, West Virginia Raleigh County , West Virginia , United States . Mead is located on County Route 33 and Stonecoal Creek convert 2.7 mi km east northeast of Rhodell, West Virginia Rhodell . ref cite map publisher West Virginia Department of Transportation title Raleigh County, West Virginia General Highway Map url http gis.wvdot.com gti County Maps Raleigh 3 of 4.pdf trans ... November 11, 2011 isbn id ref archiveurl archivedate ref Mead had a post office , which closed on June ... Raleigh County, West Virginia Category Populated places in Raleigh County, West Virginia Category Unincorporated communities in West Virginia RaleighWV geo stub ... more details
None Ship armor Ship notes USS WestMead ID 3548 , also spelled Westmead , was a United States Navy cargo ship in commission from 1918 to 1919. Construction, acquisition, and commissioning WestMead ... her name later was changed to SS WestMead or Westmead and she was completed in 1918. On 26 October 1918, the 13th Naval District inspected WestMead for possible U.S. Navy service during World War I ... number 3550, and she was Ship commissioning commissioned on 29 October 1918 as USS WestMead or Westmead ID 3548 with Lieutenant Commander N. A. Nelson, USNRF , in command. Operational history Assigned to the Naval Overseas Transportation Service , WestMead loaded 6,865 ton s of flour , departed ... she arrived on 14 December 1918. She Bunker fuel bunkered and underwent repairs at New York. WestMead ... ballast , arriving at New York City on 3 March 1919. WestMead next proceeded from New York City to Savannah ... arrived on 7 June 1919. Decommissioning and later career WestMead was both Ship decommissioning decommissioned ... Uboat accessdate 19 February 2012 ref References reflist DANFS http www.history.navy.mil danfs w6 west mead.htm http www.history.navy.mil photos shusn no spid3500.htm ID 3550 WestMead at Department of the Navy ... before the navbox Standard WWI ships Empire S ships coord missing Atlantic Ocean DEFAULTSORT WestMead Id 3550 Category Auxiliary ships of the United States Navy Category World War I cargo ships of the United ... more details
WestCentral can refer to WestCentral London Assembly constituency WC postcode area WestCentral, a residential development near Leeds WestCentral Wireless disambig ... more details
Encyclopedia
top
