|
Throughout the history of bicameralism in legislatures and parliaments, various countries and subnational political divisions have debated or carried out the abolition of upper houses or lower houses in favour of unicameralism.
Movements for abolition Reasons for the abolition of upper legislative houses vary from government to government. However, they may boil down to the following reasons: - Unelected members (in the case where upper house members are appointed by the head of the executive branch)
- Less democratic legitimacy and under-representation of minority ethnics and sexes
- Government expenditure on the maintenance of the house
- Longer and unlimited terms in office (leading to accusations of monarchism)
- Slow process of legislation due to upper house scrutiny
Australia The Australian state of Queensland had a Legislative Council before abolishing it in 1922. Prior to its abolition, members of the Legislative Council were not elected, but appointed by the Governor of Queensland. The Labor Government of Ted Theodore made the necessary appointments, and on 27 October 1921, the Legislative Council voted itself out of existence. All other Australian states continue to have bicameral systems. Estonia According to the 1938 Constitution, the Riigikogu had two chambers, which replaced the unicameral system. The lower chamber was called Riigivolikogu and the upper chamber was named Riigin ukogu. Both chambers were disbanded in 1940, following the Soviet occupation, and rigged[1] elections for only the lower chamber Riigivolikogu were held. According to the 1992 Constitution of Estonia, the parliament is once again unicameral.[2] Canada Federal Both the New Democratic Party and the Bloc Qu b cois have called for the abolition of the Senate of Canada; furthermore, the NDP does not actively hold seats in the Senate due to its abstention from the House, and has called for a referendum on the abolition of the Senate.[3] Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper has stated that the Senate "must either change or like the old upper houses of our provinces vanish".[4] Support for the abolition of the Senate has been voiced by the premiers of four provinces: Ontario,[5] British Columbia, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. Provincial-level Some Canadian provinces once possessed upper houses, but abolished them to adopt unicameral systems. Newfoundland had a Legislative Council prior to joining Canada, as did Ontario when it was Upper Canada. Manitoba had an upper chamber until it was abolished in 1876, New Brunswick's upper chamber was abolished in 1892, Prince Edward Island's upper chamber was abolished in 1893, Nova Scotia's upper chamber was abolished in 1928 and Qu bec's upper chamber was abolished in 1968.[6] New Zealand The (appointed) New Zealand Legislative Council was abolished in 1951. United States Federal In addition to calls for the abolition of the electoral college for presidential elections, a smaller minority of political activists have called for the abolition of the United States Senate.[7][8] State-level Nebraska is the only state in the United States to have a unicameral legislature, which it achieved when it abolished its lower house in 1934. During the governorship of Jesse Ventura in Minnesota, he called for the state to have a unicameral legislature. Other countries Croatia, Denmark, Greece, Hungary, Peru, Portugal, Sweden, Turkey and Venezuela once possessed upper houses but abolished them to adopt unicameral systems. References - ↑ Justice in The Baltic at Time magazine on Monday, August 19, 1940
- ↑ The legislative bodies of the Republic of Estonia
- ↑ ''Layton urges referendum on abolishing Senate'', Steve Lambert, Toronto Star, Nov 04, 2007
- ↑
- ↑
- ↑ ''House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition'', Audrey O Brien and Marc Bosc, 2009
- ↑ ''Abolish the Senate!'', by Timothy Noah, Slate.com
- ↑ ''The Black Hole Option: Abolish the Senate'', by Bob Fertik, democrats.com
|
Encyclopedia
top
